Both the machines are similar in capacity , by design and have same principle of operation .
Dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence are two approaches to translation. Dynamic equivalence focuses on conveying the meaning and intent of the original text in a way that resonates with the target audience, prioritizing comprehension over literal accuracy. In contrast, formal equivalence emphasizes a word-for-word translation, maintaining the original structure and phrasing as closely as possible, even if it makes the text less accessible. Essentially, dynamic equivalence seeks to capture the spirit of the text, while formal equivalence aims for fidelity to the original wording.
Had
Equation
1/2
patricia
Equal. For example, 4*8=30+2
Type equivalence occurs when two variables are of the same type. For example, if both variables are int (integer variables), they are of equal types. Equivalence can also occur with two different types that are compatible with each other.
An relation is equivalent if and only if it is symmetric, reflexive and transitive. That is, if a ~ b and b ~a, if a ~ a, and if a ~ b, and b ~ c, then a ~ c.
An example of a false equivalence. It incorrectly compares two different units of measurement that are not equal in any way.
An Equivalence fallacy is the error of defining distinct and conflicting items in similar terms, thus equating tow items that are not, in fact, equal. An author who suggests that one act of serious wrongdoing does not differ from a minor offence commits the fallacy of moral equivalence. A different kind of Equivalence Fallacy is used when, for example, a politician argues: "Yes, I used illegal money to fund my campaign ... but so did my opponent!" This type of moral equivalence fallacy is called the "tu quo" argument ("But you're one too!").
An equivalence relationship is a relationship over the set of integers defined for as follows:For equivalence modulo n (n being a positive integer),a ~ b (mod n) n divides (a-b)This partitions the set of integers into n equivalence classes: {0, 1, 2, ... , n-1}.
It mean the equivalence ratio is equal to 1.
Dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence are two approaches to translation. Dynamic equivalence focuses on conveying the meaning and intent of the original text in a way that resonates with the target audience, prioritizing comprehension over literal accuracy. In contrast, formal equivalence emphasizes a word-for-word translation, maintaining the original structure and phrasing as closely as possible, even if it makes the text less accessible. Essentially, dynamic equivalence seeks to capture the spirit of the text, while formal equivalence aims for fidelity to the original wording.
No, the pH is not always 7 at the equivalence point. The pH at the equivalence point depends on the nature of the acid and base being titrated.
The pH at the equivalence point may not always be 7 in a neutralization titration because the nature of the acid and base being titrated can affect the pH. For example, if a strong acid is titrated with a weak base, the equivalence point may be acidic (pH < 7) due to the excess of the strong acid present. Conversely, if a strong base is titrated with a weak acid, the equivalence point may be basic (pH > 7) due to the excess of the strong base.
An equivalence relation on a set is one that is transitive, reflexive and symmetric. Given a set A with n elements, the largest equivalence relation is AXA since it has n2 elements. Given any element a of the set, the smallest equivalence relation is (a,a) which has n elements.
give an example of safety needs