No, the 68 Camaro RS (Rally Sport) had hideaway lights. You could get an SS RS which would have the hideaway lights.
The doors are not the same.
No, the 66 has the rectangular tail lights. 68 has round lights. I own a 66, but I prefer the 68 tail lights. google Impala images.
General Motors made the '68 Camaro'. '68 Camaro' had more pointed front grille and divided rear tail lights. The front running lights were changed from circular to oval.
A caprice of same body style is always worth more than an Impala, provided it has the same features. IMPALA SS and SS 427 are worth more than Caprice though.
65 ft-lbs 65 is 94 & 95 68 is 91-93
the grille is broken up with a center piece and the back taillights are more square and rectangular where as the 68 chargers were 2 round taillights on each side with the back-up lights just below and in between the taillights, the 69's back-up lights were on the lower valance panel in the back under the bumper, also on the 68 it has round side marker lights and the 69 had rectangular side marker lights.
They are structural, so, you have to cut them off, and weld the new ones on.
They are, but keep in mind that the side marker lights differ between years -round in 68, rectangular in 69 (the 67s, though,didn't have any).
1 hour labor charge.
No the 1969 dodge charger came with long tail lights. Round tail lights came on the 1968 Dodge charger. In fact the only difference between the 68 and the 69 charger is the shape of the tail lights and turning signals.
Yes - the 68-72 Nova hoods, door skins, fenders, quarters fit 73 and 74. The only difference is the front clip (grill, lights, bumpers, front windows).