A DTS Certifying Officer is not responsible for approving travel requests or expenses that exceed established limits without proper authorization. Additionally, they do not have the authority to override travel policies or make exceptions to regulations. Their primary role is to ensure the accuracy and legality of travel claims before they are processed.
Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity.
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
Yes, the Certifying Officer in the Defense Travel System (DTS) is responsible for certifying the legitimacy of the expenses claimed in a travel voucher. This includes verifying that the expenses comply with applicable regulations and guidelines. The Certifying Officer ensures that all charges are valid, properly documented, and authorized before approving the reimbursement. Their certification helps maintain accountability and integrity in the travel reimbursement process.
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
They provide information to DAOs.
Yes, it is true that a certifying officer cannot be ordered to certify an illegal or improper payment. Certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that payments made by the government are lawful and comply with applicable regulations. If a payment is deemed illegal or improper, the certifying officer has a duty to refuse certification to uphold financial integrity and accountability.
A certifying officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity
NononoA Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularityCertifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity.A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularityWhat
It’s def false
TRUE
No