a stock ls1 always has more power than a stock lt1
you dont have a ls1 you have a lt1. the ls1 was in 98-02 camaro
350 Ls1 or 350 lt1 but the Lt1 has a cast iron block and the ls1 have a all aluminum block there fore the ls1 block is lighter. "but the make the same horsepower
lt1 has about 295 stock at flywheel, ls1 has about 305
LT1
Yes, they came stock. That's incorrect. the LS1 didn't come out until late 97 almost 98. The Buick Roadmaster came stock with a 5.7 litre 350 cu. in LT1 motor the option was the 5.0 litre 305 cu. in motor. The LS1 replaced the LT1 as the LS1 motor got better mileage and more horsepower. And the corvette was the first to get this motor. That's not to say that someone didn't put one in a wagon and swapped out the motor.
nope
LT1 has a Opti-Spark distributor, whereas the LS1 is distributor less and has individual coils among other upgrades. Not to mention the cylinder heads on an LS1 were touched by God.
The 1994 Chevy Caprice did not come with an LS1 style motor. It came with either a 4.3liter LT1 V8 or a 5.7liter LT1 V8. Tell me which motor you have and I'll get you the torque specs. I do know the horsepower rating for both engines off the top of my head. 200hp for the 4.3 and 260hp for the 5.7
there is no such thing as a 1994 ls1. the ls1 didnt come out until 1998. in 1994 they had the LT1 which would have had 240 crank hp The LS1 motor actually first came out in 1997 for the C5 Corvette. The 1994 F-bodies with the LT1 were rated at 275hp at the flywheel.
A vortec 5.7 is a lt1 based engine.
The LS1 and LT1 designations are for the engine not the transmission. A 1993 Camaro Z28 would have originally been fitted with an LT1 engine. Available transmissions behind the LT1 would have been the Borg Warner T-56 (manual), or the 4L60E (automatic).
In terms of power the LS1 is better. They dyno 300 to the wheels stock and run low 13's with an experienced driver. The LT1 cars dyno 240-250 and run low 14's/