Unconstitutional, as its purpose is spiritual rather than secular
unconstitutional as it promotes religion and amounts to an establishment of religion by the state. (APEX)
Since it is the Supreme Court that decides what is constitutional and what is not, the decisions of the Supreme Court cannot be unconstitutional, however, it is always possible for the Supreme Court to make new decisions which reverse older decisions. So in theory, if the Supreme Court does something wrong, they will be reversed by a later sitting of the same court (but with new judges).
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
The power of judicial review. Marbury v. Madison in 1803 established the tradition of the Supreme Court's role in "interpreting" whether or not a law passed by Congress is Constitutional or unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court's and lower courts' primary power is judicial review, the ability of a court to evaluate laws or executive orders relevant to cases before the court to determine whether they are constitutional. The US Supreme Court is the ultimate authority on constitutional interpretation and can nullify an unconstitutional law, rendering it unenforceable.
A constitutional amendment is proposed and submitted to the states for approval
It is not unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional.
The SC can declare a law constitutional or unconstitutional.
Supreme Court
The Supreme Court's task is to declare whether an act is constitutional or unconstitutional
It is when the Supreme Court can overturn Laws Challenged by the Judiciary as Unconstitutional.
in considering the scores of challenges to those state laws, the supreme court found the mandatory death penalty laws unconstitutional, though the 2 stage approach was seen to be constitutional.
No it can't. The only way to overturn a supreme court decision is either another supreme court decision, or a constitutional amendment.
In USA the Supreme court judges decide as to whether certain laws are constitutional or not. eg.In the Brown vs Board of education of TOPEKA 1954 case the supreme court ruled that the " separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional
The executive branch is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws. However, the supreme court has the power to deem any action unconstitutional or unlawful, and prevent or undo those actions.
Since it is the Supreme Court that decides what is constitutional and what is not, the decisions of the Supreme Court cannot be unconstitutional, however, it is always possible for the Supreme Court to make new decisions which reverse older decisions. So in theory, if the Supreme Court does something wrong, they will be reversed by a later sitting of the same court (but with new judges).
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
The power of judicial review. Marbury v. Madison in 1803 established the tradition of the Supreme Court's role in "interpreting" whether or not a law passed by Congress is Constitutional or unconstitutional.