The courts have no power of enforcement; they can declare a statute unconstitutional and render it unenforceable, but they require the Executive Branch (President or Governor) to provide actual enforcement.
The US Constitution does not guarantee education as a right or entitlement. That has been added by statute and regulation.
The federal statue will control due to the Supremacy Clause.
judicial review
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was influenced by the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom. This statute, drafted by Thomas Jefferson in 1777, emphasized the separation of church and state and the right to practice religion freely without government interference. The First Amendment reflects these principles by prohibiting Congress from establishing a religion and protecting individuals' rights to freely exercise their religion.
The documents that influenced ideas about government include: - Magna Carta - The Constitution - English Bill of Rights - Mayflower Compact - Declaration of Independence - State Constitutions - Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom
It wouldn't be called null or void, but yes, the federal courts can and do declare a state and federal statutes unconstitutional. This has the effect of repealing the statute.
When, with the required mental state, his conduct violates a federal, state, or local statute.
Federal. The dual government is set up in such a way that if federal and state are in conflict, federal trumps. The order is as follows: Federal constitution Federal statute Federal case law Federal regulations and administrative law State constitution State statute State case law State regulations and administrative law
us constitution
Disagreement over the deserved power of the federal government as written in the Constitution might still be commonplace if this amendment had not been ratified. After this amendment was passed, if the federal government attempted to "persuade" a state to enforce a federal statute, it was considered unconstitutiona.
This is a list of U.S. states where the recognition and performance of same-sex marriage is explicitly banned either by the constitution or by statute.Alabama (by constitution and statute);Arkansas (by constitution and statute);Florida (by constitution and statute);Georgia (by constitution and statute);Kansas (by constitution and statute); (Legalization of same-sex marriage is imminent.)Louisiana (by constitution and statute);Minnesota (by statute only);Mississippi (by constitution and statue);Missouri (by constitution and statute; recognition is legal);Montana (by constitution and statute); (Legalization of same-sex marriage is imminent.)Nebraska (by constitution and statute);North Dakota (by constitution and statute);Ohio (by constitution and statute);South Carolina (by constitution and statute); (Legalization of same-sex marriage is imminent.)Tennessee (by constitution and statute)
Trick question. That depends on the state statute and whether it is repugnant to the US Constitution or federal law in an area where the federal government asserts supremacy. If the statute falls under the penumbra of states' rights, then the statute is controlling and the US Supreme Court will (should) uphold it. If the statute is unconstitutional under the US Constitution and involves a part of the Constitution incorporated (applied) to the states, then the US Supreme Court decision is controlling. If the statute would be unconstitutional under the US Constitution, but involves a part of the constitution not incorporated to the states (for example, the Seventh Amendment), the Supreme Court will decide whether to apply the Constitution, which would then be binding on all states, or whether to allow the state statute to stand, in which case the state statute would be controlling.
Alabama (by constitution and statute);Arizona (by constitution and statute);Arkansas (by constitution and statute);Florida (by constitution and statute);Georgia (by constitution and statute);Kansas (by constitution and statute);Kentucky (by constitution and statute);Louisiana (by constitution and statute);Michigan (by constitution and statute);Mississippi (by constitution and statue);Missouri (by constitution and statute);Montana (by constitution and statute);Nebraska (by constitution and statute);North Dakota (by constitution and statute);Ohio (by constitution and statute);South Carolina (by constitution and statute);Tennessee (by constitution and statute); and,Texas (by constitution and statute).
An employer can terminate an employee for good reason, bad reason or no reason, unless the termination violates a statute. Firing a felon violates no statute.
Yes, there is no consent required to enforce a statute. It is a law and has to be enforced.
The US Constitution does not guarantee education as a right or entitlement. That has been added by statute and regulation.
The federal perjury statute of limitations is five years.