answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, southern politicians largely supported slavery as it was integral to the economy and social structure of the South. They defended it as a necessary institution for agricultural production, particularly in cotton farming, and often argued for states' rights to maintain it. This support was a significant factor in the political tensions leading up to the Civil War.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about American Government

What did the southern support?

they supported slavery


Why were southern politicians opposed to wilmot proviso?

The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]


Why were southern politicians opposed the wilmot proviso?

The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]


Why were southern politicians opposed to Wilmot provisio?

Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, which threatened the balance of power between free and slave states. They viewed it as an infringement on their rights to expand slavery into new territories, crucial for the agricultural economy of the South. Additionally, the Proviso was seen as part of a broader effort by Northern abolitionists to undermine the institution of slavery altogether, leading to increased sectional tensions.


Why were southern politicians opposed to the Wilmer proviso?

Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico following the Mexican-American War. They viewed the proviso as a direct threat to the institution of slavery and the rights of slaveholders, fearing it would limit their economic and political power. Additionally, they believed that states should have the right to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery, seeing the proviso as an infringement on states' rights. This opposition was rooted in the broader context of maintaining a balance of power between free and slave states in Congress.

Related Questions

Who did not believe slavery should be abolished?

Southern cotton-growers (the 'Plantocracy') and their local politicians.


What did the southern support?

they supported slavery


Why did southern support slavery?

cause they can


Why were southern politicians opposed to wilmot proviso?

The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]


Why were southern politicians opposed the wilmot proviso?

The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]


How did the Southern political leaders become convinced that slavery was under attack by the North?

There were many abolitionist activists and politicians who wanted to get rid of slavery.


Why did southern democrats support slavery?

cause they can


Which or these individuals would most likely support the figitive slave act?

Individuals who supported the Fugitive Slave Act were those who believed in upholding the institution of slavery and enforcing laws that allowed slave owners to recapture escaped slaves. Pro-slavery advocates, Southern plantation owners, and politicians who favored preserving the economic and social system of slavery were most likely to support the Fugitive Slave Act.


Who were the southern politicians against slavery?

Southern politicians against slavery were relatively few and often faced significant opposition within their own regions. Notable figures included John Quincy Adams, who, though a Northern politician, advocated against the expansion of slavery in the South, and George William Curtis, a Southern-born abolitionist. Additionally, some members of the Democratic Party, like Thomas Hart Benton, expressed anti-slavery sentiments, though they were often marginalized. Overall, the anti-slavery sentiment in the South was limited, as most political power was held by pro-slavery advocates.


Who did not belive slavery should be abolished?

There were various individuals and groups who did not believe that slavery should be abolished, including some Southern plantation owners, pro-slavery advocates, and politicians who benefited economically from the institution of slavery. Additionally, some argued that slavery was a necessary component of the economy and society at the time.


How did issues of states' rights and slavery increase tension between the north and south?

Northern workers opposed slavery; southern planters support it


Why were southern politicians opposed to Wilmot provisio?

Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, which threatened the balance of power between free and slave states. They viewed it as an infringement on their rights to expand slavery into new territories, crucial for the agricultural economy of the South. Additionally, the Proviso was seen as part of a broader effort by Northern abolitionists to undermine the institution of slavery altogether, leading to increased sectional tensions.