0
What else can I help you with?
Who had political power in the southern colonies?
Rich white plantation owners and they're control of slaves and cotton.
How did the goals of sharecroppers and plantation owners conflict?
The goals of sharecroppers and plantation owners conflicted primarily over economic interests and power dynamics. Sharecroppers aimed for fair compensation and better living conditions as they worked the land, seeking stability and self-sufficiency. In contrast, plantation owners sought to maximize profits and maintain control over the labor force, often enforcing exploitative practices to keep sharecroppers in debt and dependent. This fundamental clash over labor rights and economic equity fueled tensions between the two groups.
What did slaveholders want?
Slave owners wanted money. They tried for things like power and control but this all tied back to more money. Occasionally they raped the slaves (used them like mistresses) but the main thing was money
What changes did the new government make in Southern states?
They established public schools, roads, rail roads, and hospitals. Also reduced power of plantation owners.
How did the white landowners in the south reassert their economic power in the decade following the civil war?
The former slave owners would offer the slaves pieces of the plantation to live and work for a part of the profit. This was called sharecropping and it enabled the former slaves and their owners to both make money. The plantation owner couldn't farm the land by himself so deals were make to farm the land together. Poor whites also went in partners as sharecroppers with the land owners so as to survive. The north had devastated the southern land and survival was accomplished by sticking together and living off the land. Northern senators did everything to punish the south so money was scarce to re building. It took the south about 40 years to get back on her feet.1 year ago
Who had political power in the southern colonies?
Rich white plantation owners and they're control of slaves and cotton.
What is the reason plantation owners perferred to have slaves rather than indertured servants?
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong source of labor, whereas indentured servants typically worked for a set period before gaining their freedom. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing plantation owners with a greater sense of control and power. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time made slaves a more socially acceptable form of labor exploitation.
Which of the following statements is true because plantation owners owned the most land and slaves?
Plantation owners had significant wealth and power due to their control of land and slaves. They played a dominant role in the economy and politics of the antebellum South, influencing social structures and shaping regional development. The vast resources at their disposal allowed them to wield considerable influence and maintain a privileged position in society.
Which social class came to control the economy as well as the political and social institutions of the South?
The white elite class, comprised of wealthy plantation owners and businessmen, came to dominate the economy, politics, and society of the South after the Civil War. This class held significant power and influence, shaping the region's policies and maintaining control over labor and resources.
Why was it important it is for slave owners to keep slaves ignorant?
Slave owners kept slaves ignorant to maintain control and power over them. By restricting their access to education and information, slave owners were able to prevent slaves from becoming aware of their rights and abilities, making it easier to exploit and control them. Keeping slaves ignorant also prevented them from organizing or resisting their situation effectively.
Why statement are true because the plantation owners owned the most land and slaves?
The statement is true as plantation owners in the South during the antebellum period held significant economic and political power due to their ownership of vast amounts of land and slaves. This allowed them to influence local and state governments, shaping policies in their favor and reinforcing the institution of slavery.
Why did slaves take their owners' last names?
Slaves took their owners' last names as a way to show ownership and control over them. It was a common practice during slavery to strip slaves of their own identities and replace them with the names of their owners, reinforcing the power dynamic between slave and owner.
Why were the Seminoles such a threat to the southern plantation owners?
Because they had more power.
Who prevented slaves from having knowledge?
Slave owners and overseers in the United States prevented slaves from obtaining knowledge by implementing laws that prohibited education for slaves. Additionally, teaching slaves to read and write was seen as a threat to the established social order and control over the enslaved population. Slave owners wanted to maintain power and control by restricting access to knowledge and education among slaves.
Did the slaves or owners enforce slave codes?
Slave codes were laws created and enforced by slave owners and governing bodies to control and regulate the behavior of enslaved individuals. These laws were designed to maintain the institution of slavery and reinforce the power dynamics between owners and slaves.
Why do you think some slave owners offered a reward for the runnawy slaves?
Slave owners offered rewards for runaway slaves to incentivize others to help capture and return them, as well as to deter other slaves from attempting to escape. It was also a way for slave owners to exert control and maintain power over their enslaved population.
Why was it against the law for slaves to learn?
Slave owners feared that educated slaves would be more likely to rebel or escape, as education can lead to awareness of one's rights and abilities. Keeping slaves uneducated also reinforced the power dynamic, making it easier for owners to control and exploit them.
