It would do this because people have freedoms and now they are being taken away
Attainder means the extinguishment of a person's civil rights upon conviction of a crime, usually treason. The Constitution forbids Congress from passing a "bill of attainder". A bill of attainder is an act by the legislature that some particular person is guilty of a crime then taking away his rights all without the benefit of a trial in the courts. Such a practice would take away the rights to trial by jury, to face one's accusers and to be convicted only upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt among other rights citizens of this country have. The legislature has the right to pass laws to declare types of actions criminal and set the penalties for violating them, but it does not have the power to convict persons of those crimes.
They threaten they would kill them.
Depends who you are.... extremest liberal or conservative would say we have no freedom.. Anyone else would say we have enough freedom but we have laws so its not communism nor is it anarchy
we have freedom
he meant that his since of freedom is as pale as a white man was, he asked the question as a "freedom should only be enjoyed by only his type of people." but america is the land of the free. where everyone should enjoy being free. saying to a slave what would you do with freedom is saying to a black man. you dont know what freedom is, and what would you do with it even if you had it. what will you do with freedom? Freedom is the same to every walk of life. everyone longs to be free to have a family, to love..
It would do this because people have freedoms and now they are being taken away
Freedom
(also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial. The United States Constitution forbids both the federal and state governments to enact bills of attainder, in Article 1, Sections 9 and 10, respectively. It was considered an excess or abuse of the British monarchy and Parliament. They are fundamentally impossible to abolish in United Kingdom because of parliamentary sovereignty - any statute purporting to abolish bills of attainder would be superseded and by implication repealed by any later parliament actually passing an act of attainder - but the successive recent Parliaments have exercised such restraint in using this abusive and unpopular power that no bills of attainder have been passed after 1798. Attainder as such was also a legal consequence of convictions in courts of law, but this ceased to be a part of punishment in 1870 [1]
Attainder means the extinguishment of a person's civil rights upon conviction of a crime, usually treason. The Constitution forbids Congress from passing a "bill of attainder". A bill of attainder is an act by the legislature that some particular person is guilty of a crime then taking away his rights all without the benefit of a trial in the courts. Such a practice would take away the rights to trial by jury, to face one's accusers and to be convicted only upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt among other rights citizens of this country have. The legislature has the right to pass laws to declare types of actions criminal and set the penalties for violating them, but it does not have the power to convict persons of those crimes.
The loss of slavery would threaten the Southern economy.
It would threaten them because they have no one to do their work for them then they would have to do their own work by hand and see how they feel.
No earth? ;)
If you were doing your job there would be no reason for your employer to threaten to fire you.
The digestive system prepares liquid and solid nutrientsfor use by cells by breaking down the complex molecules that give living things energy and raw material, if there was an infection it would disrupt the function of the digestive system
Um, NO. Why would you think that?
deforestation
threaten his nation again.