Your question is far to vague. You need to explain what government and what constitution. How the people would react. hat you mean by strong.
Chat with our AI personalities
Alexander Hamilton favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which allowed for a strong national government because Congress could pass laws based on the "elastic clause."
The Federalists believed that the best form of government was a government divided between the state and national levels, with a strong central (national) government. This is the system we have used since the Constitution was written and ratified.
To show anti-federalists as well as the general public that the Constitution is a great thing.
the lack of a strong national government is the people behind the government helping the government pass all the test to become a national government on its own.
The Federalists believed in a strong central government, that the elite/ educated should lead, loose interpretation of the Constitution, a strong national bank, and control of shipping and manufacturing.
the national government would be to strong
The Constitution.
federalists
there are many arguements, like army, immigration, and so many others.
In the debate around the ratification of the Constitution in the United States in 1788, those in favor of the Constitution and its concept of a strong centralized government were called Federalists.
They wanted a strong national government -Answer Given By Gillian ;)
Alexander Hamilton favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which allowed for a strong national government because Congress could pass laws based on the "elastic clause."
the national government would be to strong
The constitution of the Iriquois League shows that women had a strong voice in the government.
The Federalists believed that the best form of government was a government divided between the state and national levels, with a strong central (national) government. This is the system we have used since the Constitution was written and ratified.
They felt that the national government described by the Constitution was too strong and would lead to a monarchy.
They felt it was creating a strong national government that could deny rights for citizens