Y-E-S spells yes
Of if you researched instead of shooting from the hip as the guy before me did, you would find that the real answer is, it depends (the typical law answer). Is the portion severable from the rest of the statute? In other words, will the statute still make sense and operate without the portion that is unconstitutional? If the answer is yes, then the statute is only unconstitutional in part. If the answer is no, then the whole statute is unconstitutional.
It was only unconstitutional if you accepted Roger Taney's interpretation of the Constitution in his judgment of the Dred Scott case in 1857. He said the Constitution protected slavery - so therefore no state could declare itself to be free soil.
No it does not allow the courts to overrule the will of the people because they only label it constitutional or unconstitutional and other branches have a little help in it. If it is unconstitutional the court wont bother with it. :)
Australia is the only country which is also an entire continent.
No. Only the President of the United States can do this. However, when a law is enacted, and then challenged in the court system, it may be appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court where it may then be ruled unconstitutional.
The second national bank was unconstitutional because Andrew Jackson believed that the bank mainly looked out for the rich and powerful and the common man. You have to remember, that during Jackson's presidency it was also the time for the common age (where the president suppots the common people)
No, they can render an opinion as to it beng unconstitutional but they have no power to invalidate the law. They must forward it to the Supreme Court for their review and judgement. Only the Supreme Court can nullify the law and invalidate an Act of Congress.
No, unless it creates some serious fraud, it only invalidates that clause.
invalidate is the only one i can think of try for the other one.
No, an Appeals Court cannot 'find' a law unconstitutional. They might declare a law to be unconstitutional IN THEIR BELIEF, but they can only overturn the decision of the lower court and/or return it to them for further action or consideration. Only the U.S. Supreme Court can find a law unconstitutional.
Congress cannot declare laws unconstitutional. The Judiciary Branch may declare a law unconstitutional only if it conflicts with some provision of the State or Federal Constitution. The Supreme Court can rule a law to be unconstitutional, but Congress, along with the States, can only amend the Constitution.
Congress can REPEAL any law, constitutional or not. Only the Court can overturn a law because it is unconstitutional.
No, koalas are only found in Australia unless they are in a zoo.
Yes because the legislative branch can overthrow the veto of the president. The only reason why the president would veto a bill is if it unconstitutional.
Since it is not the only identifying information on the license it is still legal.
Because America, in general, is unconstitutional
yes. only the judicial can declare a law uncontitutional.
I cannot see why you would want to, it saves lives. However, remove the entire braking system and replace with a type-approved non-abs system. For fault diagnosis only, disconnect the abs block wiring. NOTE:Running a vehicle with fitted abs inhibited, unless designed to do so, is dangerous and could invalidate insurance.