0
What else can I help you with?
In 1969 the Supreme Court significantly broadened the protections afforded political speech by?
overturning the conviction of a member of the Ku Klux Klan
What protections does the supreme court judges have?
secret service protection
Who broadened the Supreme courts power?
Chief Justice John Marshall
What do you think of Supreme Court Justices having political party affiliations?
Supreme Court Justices do not necessarily have parties because they do not run for a political seat. The criteria for a supreme court justice has to be someone who is familiar with the law such as a former lawyer. If Supreme Court justices ran on a political platform that could complicate the position they hold because many political parties have money or a platform they run on.
In a 2004 case involving the issue of whether a US citizen accused of terrorist acts is entitled to constitutional protections the Supreme Court held that such citizens?
In the 2004 case Hamdi vs. Rumsfield the Supreme Court held that citizens accused of terrorist acts are entitled to constitutional protections. Hamdi, a US citizen was captured in Afghanistan and turned over to the US military. He was classified as a enemy combatant.
In 1969 the Supreme Court significantly broadened the protections afforded political speech by?
overturning the conviction of a member of the Ku Klux Klan
What protections does the supreme court judges have?
secret service protection
Who broadened the Supreme courts power?
Chief Justice John Marshall
What supreme court decisions expand the protections of assistance of counsel?
Gideon v Wainwright
What did the majority of Supreme Court cases in the 1960 have in common?
The majority of Supreme Court cases in the 1960s focused on civil rights and individual liberties, reflecting the social and political upheaval of the era. Many landmark decisions addressed issues such as racial discrimination, voting rights, and the rights of the accused, exemplified by cases like Brown v. Board of Education and Miranda v. Arizona. These rulings often aimed to expand the protections afforded by the Constitution, particularly under the Fourteenth Amendment. The decade was marked by a strong emphasis on ensuring equality and justice in American society.
. What was the significance of Supreme Court's ruling in In re Gault?
It was determined that minors are entitled to constitutional protections.
What was the significance of supreme courts ruling in re gault?
It was determined that minors are entitled to constitutional protections.
Supreme political power or authority?
Sovereignty
Do the us supreme court justices reflect and support the political agenda?
yes"the us supreme court justices reflect and support the political agenda
What did the supreme court decide about children's rights?
Children were generally afforded basic rights embodied in the constitution, born in a marriage or not, excluding children not yet born
What do you think of Supreme Court Justices having political party affiliations?
Supreme Court Justices do not necessarily have parties because they do not run for a political seat. The criteria for a supreme court justice has to be someone who is familiar with the law such as a former lawyer. If Supreme Court justices ran on a political platform that could complicate the position they hold because many political parties have money or a platform they run on.
What does the Supreme Court have to do with the Bill of Rights?
The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in interpreting the Bill of Rights, which consists of the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution that protect individual liberties. Through judicial review, the Court determines how these rights apply in specific cases, setting legal precedents that shape the understanding of civil liberties. Landmark decisions often clarify the scope of rights such as free speech, due process, and the right to bear arms, ensuring that the protections afforded by the Bill of Rights are upheld in contemporary society.
