No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
Primary Source
The encyclopedia
A letter is a primary source.
A biography of Abraham Lincoln. (apex)
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
I believe that a encyclopedia is a secondary source, because the person who wrote it most likely didn't witness every single event in it. __--FROM GENIUS--__
No, an encyclopedia is considered a secondary source because it compiles information from various primary sources. It provides an overview or summary of topics based on existing research and knowledge.
an example of a secondary source is a history/textbookbook, websites, reviews, encyclopedia, dictionary.annotations or commentaries on primary sources such as cases or legislators.
C. A recording of a speech
an example of a secondary source is a history/textbookbook, websites, reviews, encyclopedia, dictionary.annotations or commentaries on primary sources such as cases or legislators.
no, it is not a primary source of information(usually for market research) as primary reserch involves actually talking to existing or potential customers to obtain information,it is called field research.magazine articles are a secondary source as information was obtaines by someone else.this form of research is called desk research.
Secondary. A secondary souce is written after the event happened, like an article in an excyclopedia. A primary source is written during the tiem of the event or by someone who was alive then or was alive and witnessed it, like a newspaper article.
encyclopedia
It is a primary source.
A picture can indeed be a primary source.