0
What else can I help you with?
Is an encyclopedia a primary source?
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
Is an encyclopedia a primary?
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
How old is Manhattan bridge?
The Brooklyn Bridge opened May 24, 1883. Source(s): Encyclopedia Britannica
Is a encyclopedia a primary or secondary source?
I believe that a encyclopedia is a secondary source, because the person who wrote it most likely didn't witness every single event in it. __--FROM GENIUS--__
What happened in 1275?
Basically, trial by jury was made a law. For a more reliable source of information try using Encyclopedia Britannica.
Is Britannica a reliable source that can be used for research purposes?
Yes, Britannica is generally considered a reliable source for research purposes due to its rigorous editorial process and reputation for accuracy.
Is a encyclopedia a primary source?
Generally no. A primary source is firsthand experience. As in, someone who was there, saw what happened, etc. Encyclopedias are secondary sources.
Is Britannica creditable?
Yes, Britannica is a credible source of information. It is a well-respected and established encyclopedia that has been serving as a reliable source of knowledge for both students and researchers for many years. Its articles are written and reviewed by experts in various fields to ensure accuracy and reliability.
Can an encyclopedia be a primary source?
A primary source is a piece of evidence from the time of the event/person/etc you're researching, right? So unless the encyclopedia was written at the time of the event/person/etc, it will be a secondary source. In fact, some encyclopedias are more like tertiary sources, in that they try to provide a potted version of major secondary works.
Is an encyclopedia considered a scholarly source?
Yes, an encyclopedia is generally considered a scholarly source because it contains information that has been researched and written by experts in various fields.
What is generally not considered a primary source?
A secondary source, such as a textbook or analysis, is generally not considered a primary source.
Is a review article considered a primary source?
No, a review article is not considered a primary source.
