full time professionals
Some people prefer ratifying conventions over state legislatures for the ratification of amendments because conventions can provide a more direct expression of the people's will, potentially reducing partisan influence that may exist in state legislatures. Conventions can also engage a broader public dialogue and involve diverse perspectives, making the process more democratic. Additionally, conventions may be seen as a way to bypass entrenched political interests that could obstruct needed changes to the Constitution.
There are two methods: 1. A specific amendment is written and proposed by 2/3 of the Congress. Then the proposed amendment is sent for ratification to either the state legislatures or state ratifying conventions. Congress decides whether state legislatures or state ratifying conventions are to be used. For the proposed amendment to become effective 3/4 of the legislatures or conventions must ratify it. 2. A convention for proposing amendments is called for by Congress on application by 2/3 of the states for such a convention. Specific amendments are written by the convention and sent to the states for ratification. Even if the proposed amendments come from a convention rather than from Congress, it is Congress which decides whether ratification is to be by state legislatures or state ratifying conventions. Again, for the proposed amendments to become effective, 3/4 of the legislatures or conventions must ratify the proposed amendments. To date the first method, proposal by Congress itself, is the only method by which amendments have been proposed. None of the existing amendments have been proposed by a national convention. To date every amendment to the Constitution with the exception of the Twenty First Amendment (Repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment), has been ratified by state legislatures. The Twenty First Amendment is the only current amendment that has been ratified by state ratifying conventions.
Southern state legislatures primarily used methods such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and understanding clauses to suppress black voter turnout. However, one method that is not typically associated with these efforts is the abolition of the electoral college, which is a federal mechanism and not a state-level tactic for disenfranchisement. Other methods, like gerrymandering, were also used, but they were more about manipulating district boundaries rather than directly targeting voter eligibility.
Senators were to be chosen by state legislatures, because many of the Framers of the US Constitution did not trust the general populace of the country to vote for the right men to be Senators. Once the decision to have two houses of Congress in the form of a Senate and House of Representatives had been made, the idea was that the Senate would be the wiser, more responsible of the two Houses. The Senate was seen in much the same way as the British House of Lords is in comparison to the British House of Commons. The Framers debated four methods of choosing the Senators: by the House of Rpresentatives; by the national executive (President); by the state legislatures; or by the general public. They settled on the state legislatures because they felt each state's Senators should be chosen by the states themselves but that the Senate was too important to be left to the general public. In fact, several framers thought the general public was not much better than a mob.
First, an amendment may be proposed if two-thirds of both houses of Congress approve the amendment and agree to send it to the states. Second, an amendment can be proposed if Congress calls for a national convention at the request of two-thirds of all of the state legislatures. Ratification can occur in one of two ways. One method is for three-fourths of all state legislatures to ratify the amendment by a positive, or yes vote. The second method is through special conventions called in each state for the specific purpose of ratifying the proposed amendment.
William Few believed that having state legislatures elect representatives to the national legislature would help maintain a balance of power between the states and the federal government. He believed that state legislatures were more likely to choose representatives who would prioritize the interests of their respective states, rather than being influenced by national political parties or other external factors.
they had more african americans than any other state
Yes, it would be possible, though not likely, for North Dakota and South Dakota to become one state. However, it would take the approval of both state legislatures, along with approval by the US Congress.Article 4 of the US Constitution says:Section 3: New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
Today as the roads are more crowded it is in a car that is more likely.
Significantly more middle-class representatives and fewer wealthy members compared to before the war.
The expansion of backcountry districts increased democratic representation in state legislatures by giving a voice to a broader segment of the population, particularly rural and less affluent citizens who had previously been marginalized. As these districts emerged, they often challenged the dominance of established political elites in urban areas, leading to a more diverse set of interests being represented. This shift allowed for the election of representatives who were more attuned to the needs and concerns of backcountry constituents, fostering a more inclusive political environment. Ultimately, this expansion helped to democratize state legislatures by making them more reflective of the population as a whole.
Some people prefer ratifying conventions over state legislatures for the ratification of amendments because conventions can provide a more direct expression of the people's will, potentially reducing partisan influence that may exist in state legislatures. Conventions can also engage a broader public dialogue and involve diverse perspectives, making the process more democratic. Additionally, conventions may be seen as a way to bypass entrenched political interests that could obstruct needed changes to the Constitution.
State statutes are laws enacted by state legislatures that govern a particular state. These statutes cover a wide range of issues such as criminal offenses, family law, property rights, and more. State statutes can be enforced by state courts within that jurisdiction.
The National Conference of State Legislators keep track of this and a lot more: http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legismgt/about/legislator_overview.htm
They had more african americans than any other states
yes
Idaho