its either James Madison or Henry Clay they were both elder statesmen in the compromise
One-Half Compromise was the compromise that dealt with the Northern States concern of the Southern States using slaves as part of the counted population thus influencing their representation in Congress.
The Three Fifths Compromise is one of the most controversial parts and outcomes of the Constitutional Convention. For the allocation of seats in the US House of Representatives, a black person counts for three fifths of a white person.
The small state benefited from that cuz.....big states did want to share their power equally ....So small states protested that to prevent this problem they established bicameral ( tow houses )..... :) I hope this is help full for you..
By passing the Fugitive Slave Act, which forced Northerners to report anyone who looked like a runaway slave. The Northern public greatly resented this.
Some Southern States wanted the wealth brought to them by slavery, and they wanted not to be swamped by ballots by the more populated Northern States, so a compromise was reached.
Missouri compromise
The Northern States were pleased by Three-Fifths Compromise.
The compromises that the Northern and Southern states reached were the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise.~A.K. =)
The Compromise of 1850, were five bills that were intended to crush regional bitter conflict. The goal was to handle the spread of slavery into territories in order to keep the northern and southern interests in balance.
The Compromise of 1850 included provisions that benefited the North, primarily the admission of California as a free state, which tilted the balance of power in Congress toward free states. Additionally, the compromise abolished the slave trade in Washington, D.C., further aligning with Northern anti-slavery sentiments. While it included a stricter Fugitive Slave Act that favored the South, the overall impact was more favorable to Northern interests in the context of expanding free territory.
The Northern states were opposed to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. They felt Missouri should not be a slave state as it would give the South more power.
Northern democrats who advocated peace in the south
The Northern and Southern states, and the slaves
The politicians in the North that advocated anti-slavery were called Abolitionists.
The north had some supporters of the compromise while other northerners opposed it. While the northern democrats accepted the compromise, the northern Whigs thought it to be unfair to northern territories. They especially believed that this compromise would create a problem with fugitive slaves having to force slave owning farmers to waste productive agricultural time hunting down slaves.
Basically the Missouri Compromise of 1850 was a fair compromise. One problem for Northern abolitionists was that the Compromise ushered in the Fugitive Slave Act. They were outraged that the new compromise included this law.
54'40