The delegates to the Constitutional Convention compromised on the slavery issue primarily to ensure the unity of the newly forming nation. Many Southern states relied on slavery for their agricultural economies, while Northern states were increasingly opposed to it. To achieve consensus and secure the ratification of the Constitution, they reached agreements like the Three-Fifths Compromise, which allowed slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation purposes, balancing the interests of both regions. This compromise, however, highlighted the deep divisions over slavery that would continue to plague the nation.
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
They passed the Three-Fifths Compromise and another compromise that stated that slavery would not be abolished until 1808.
There were several, but I bet the one you're thinking of was slavery.
Delegates to the Constitutional Convention compromised on the slavery question to ensure the unity of the states and facilitate ratification of the Constitution. The Southern states were heavily reliant on slavery for their economy, while many Northern states opposed it. To balance these interests, compromises like the Three-Fifths Compromise were reached, allowing states to count enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation purposes. This approach aimed to secure support from Southern states while avoiding a direct confrontation over the contentious issue of slavery.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was necessary as it aimed to balance the interests of both pro-slavery and anti-slavery delegates during the Constitutional Convention. Pro-slavery delegates wanted enslaved individuals counted for representation in Congress to gain more political power, while anti-slavery delegates opposed this, arguing that enslaved people should not be counted as citizens. The compromise allowed for enslaved individuals to be counted as three-fifths of a person, which helped to maintain a delicate balance between northern and southern states and facilitated the ratification of the Constitution. This agreement, however, reflected the deep divisions and moral compromises surrounding the issue of slavery in the early United States.
By counting 60% of slaves for the purposes of representation and taxes. All delegates to the Convention recognized that this was an imperfect compromise to a difficult issue, but many of the delegates redesigning American government didn't want to deal with slavery at all. by counting 60% for all slaves--APEX
They passed the Three-Fifths Compromise and another compromise that stated that slavery would not be abolished until 1808.
There were several, but I bet the one you're thinking of was slavery.
The delegates were right to compromise over slavery because, despite the anti-slavery sentiments of many of the delegates, the southern representatives were not about to compromise the cornerstone of their economy. Demanding the immediate end of slavery would have caused them to walk out, jeopardizing the new nation. Therefore, the delegates kept slavery but left provisions for the elimination of slavery at a later date. Also, they added the three-fifths clause, which essentially hamstrung the southern states' ability to use slaves to inflate their population and therefore their representation in the House of Representatives.
During the US Constitutional Convention there was a debate about outlawing slavery and or other means to reduce slavery. The Southern colonies-States threatened to walk out of the Convention if there was to be an outlawing of slavery. A compromise was agreed upon whereby in 1808, no more slaves could enter the new USA.
Delegates to the Constitutional Convention compromised on the slavery question to ensure the unity of the states and facilitate ratification of the Constitution. The Southern states were heavily reliant on slavery for their economy, while many Northern states opposed it. To balance these interests, compromises like the Three-Fifths Compromise were reached, allowing states to count enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation purposes. This approach aimed to secure support from Southern states while avoiding a direct confrontation over the contentious issue of slavery.
The issue of the Three-Fifths Compromise was resolved at the Constitutional Convention, which determined how slaves would be counted for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise stated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
for ever five elslaved people they counted three of them it was called a three- fifth
The Missouri Compromise postponed the issue of slavery.
Delegates at the Constitutional Convention faced significant issues that required compromise, notably representation and slavery. The Great Compromise established a bicameral legislature, balancing the interests of both populous and smaller states by creating the House of Representatives and the Senate. Additionally, the Three-Fifths Compromise addressed the contentious issue of slavery by counting enslaved individuals as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes. These compromises were essential in gaining broader support for the Constitution among the states.
Political parties avoided the issue of slavery for many years after the Missouri compromise.
The overriding issue was slavery. The compromise included The Fugitive Slave Act and agreement to allow slavery within the borders of Missouri.