The arttoney generals office.in other words ,the law and it includes the constitution of the country.
ANSWER:
By far the legislative branch has the most power of the three branches. Article I of the US Constitution gives it numerous express powers to enable it to govern the country by legislation. In contrast, the judicial branch is by far the weakest of the three branches. It has no authority to act on its own volition. It may only act in cases and controversies, which means within the context of a lawsuit. Further it has no power to enforce its own judgments. It relies on the executive branch for that.
The system of checks and balances was never intended nor does it provide for equality of power among the three branches. It was simply the separation of the three basic functions of government (legislative, executive and judicial) into three separate branches so that no function could be abused. Checks and balances does not equalize the power of each branch. It provides a means by which one branch can stop another from trying to become more powerful than it is supposed to be.
With all respect to the first answer, the attorney general's office is not a correct answer, since that office is part of the executive branch as opposed to being a separate branch of government, which is what this question refers to.
House of representatives
The legislative branch was established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.
The founding fathers separated the power to make, enforce, and interpret laws between different branches of government in order to prevent government becoming tyrannical.
The Founding Fathers wanted to guard against tyranny, so the government was divided into the branches. It was believed that each branch would "check" the other branches so that no one branch became too powerful.
There is only one member of the executive branch of American government- the president. Removal of that branch violates the system of checks and balances provided by the Founding Fathers. If you're talking about assassinations, that's also illegal and would be ineffective at "removing" the executive office from government.
House of representatives
They feared a strong executive that could operate as an authoritarian government
They wanted all of them equal, and they did that with a system of checks and balances
The system of checks was designed by our founding fathers to prevent 1 branch of government from becoming more powerful than the other.
The legislative branch was established by Article I of the Constitution, the Legislative Branch consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, which together form the United States Congress.
The Founding Fathers wanted to establish a system of checks and balances. They created the three branches so that a single branch could not take over the government.
The founding fathers separated the power to make, enforce, and interpret laws between different branches of government in order to prevent government becoming tyrannical.
checks and balances! next time read your book or actually search the web!
It's not. All three branches are equally important, like a stool with three legs, if you take one away it will not stand. The legislative branch passes laws but if the law is unconstitutional or not enforced it is useless at best and dangerous at worst. The Executive branch enforces the laws and the Judicial branch makes sure that it is constitutional. The founding fathers knew what they were doing! There is no better system of government yet created by man. God Bless America!
The Founding Fathers wanted to guard against tyranny, so the government was divided into the branches. It was believed that each branch would "check" the other branches so that no one branch became too powerful.
There is only one member of the executive branch of American government- the president. Removal of that branch violates the system of checks and balances provided by the Founding Fathers. If you're talking about assassinations, that's also illegal and would be ineffective at "removing" the executive office from government.
The current (and recent) executive branch has taken much more power unto itself than is proper. Through the use of 'executive order' and other misused tools, the Executive branch as corrupted the careful balance of power and made itself supreme.