Thomas Hobbes John Locke
people basic and natural rights
Thomas Hobbes believed men were all equal with the same basic motivations. He believed the natural state of nature was called â??warreâ?? and without proper control by a qualified government, men would resort to whatever means necessary to thrive and best other men. He believed life itself was short, brutal and nasty..
What was the basic division of government thought the Summerland
where did the basic ides of goverment come from?
Thomas Hobbes John Locke
Thomas Hobbes believed that humans are naturally selfish and violent, and therefore need a strong, centralized government to maintain order and prevent chaos. John Locke, on the other hand, thought that humans are essentially rational and reasonable, and that government should exist to protect individual rights and promote the common good. Locke also argued that individuals have the right to revolt against a government that fails to uphold their basic rights.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society
Thomas Hobbes and john Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society
Because it contrasted deeply with Hobbes depiction of the social contract and outlined the basic features of liberalism
Thomas Hobbes put forth his idea about society and individuals with the basic premise that everyone acts in their own self interest. Hobbes had allot more to say about this and other areas of society in the 17th Century.
John Locke can be consider as Fater of liberalism. Alought some consider Thomas Hobbes as Father of Liberalism as he first of all profound the rights of men, but it OS Locke who give Liberal Views a basic frame of Constitutional Government and describe three basic natural rights of Life, Liberty and Property, which becomes the base of Liberal theory further.John Locke can be consider as Fater of liberalism. Alought some consider Thomas Hobbes as Father of Liberalism as he first of all profound the rights of men, but it OS Locke who give Liberal Views a basic frame of Constitutional Government and describe three basic natural rights of Life, Liberty and Property, which becomes the base of Liberal theory further.
people basic and natural rights
john Locke was political philosopher and a proponent of natural law, and limited government. These two ideas that greatly influenced the Founding Fathers. Locke's ideas are reflected in both the Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution.
Thomas Hobbes believed men were all equal with the same basic motivations. He believed the natural state of nature was called â??warreâ?? and without proper control by a qualified government, men would resort to whatever means necessary to thrive and best other men. He believed life itself was short, brutal and nasty..
John Locke and his thoughts of the basic rights of life, liberty, and property influenced Thomas Jefferson.
John Locke believed that individuals are born with a tabula rasa, or blank slate, and their knowledge and behavior are shaped by experience and education rather than innate qualities. He argued that people are inherently rational and capable of self-governance, but society and environmental influences can shape their behavior positively or negatively.