In one sense, the President does not have any judicial powers. He can not indict people or act in the capacity of a judge . However he does appoint federal court judges, subject to Senate approval, and can pardon people convicted of federal crimes and grant amnesty to people who might otherwise be subject to prosecution for violation of federal law. He also interpret or bend the law to some extent by ordering selective enforcement of certain laws, such as with Immigration.
his party and his pistol that he keeps in his jacket pocket
President doesn't have judicial power. Only the judicial branch has that power.
to check the actions of the federal courts
President doesn't have judicial power. Only the judicial branch has that power.
The president can't use judicial powers if impeachment occurs.
Judicial activism weakens the separation of powers by involving the Court in what are traditionally executive and legislative functions. Judicial restraint reinforces separation of powers.
He has no judicial powers. Only the judicial branch has the power. The president can appoint a judge but has to get congressional approval.
President doesn't have judicial power. Only the judicial branch has that power.
President doesn't have judicial power. Only the judicial branch has that power.
The President can not exercise any judicial powers. He is the head of the Executive Branch of Government and not a member of the Judicial Branch.
to check the actions of the federal courts
pardon
impeach the president
legislative, judicial, executive
President doesn't have judicial power. Only the judicial branch has that power.
The president can't use judicial powers if impeachment occurs.
The president can veto a bill, which prevents it from passing. The judicial system can exercise a power known as judicial review to determine if a law is constitutional.
Judicial activism weakens the separation of powers by involving the Court in what are traditionally executive and legislative functions. Judicial restraint reinforces separation of powers.