hat ar two type of juissdicton
The Supreme Court must have a simple majority to render a decision in a case.
No. The justices only address as much as necessary to render a decision, but they will typically acknowledge the other issues by commenting that the opinion does not reach the questions (or errors) that fall outside the scope of their decision.
This will render a Supreme Court opinion.
The state Courts of Appeal review and render decisions on cases appealed to them from the lower circuits of the state court system. No actual jury trials are held at this level, they simply review the cases for legal sufficiency and render a verdict either affirming them or remanding them back to the lower courts for re-trial. State Supreme Courts hear all cases which have been appealed past the circuit court and appelate levels and - like the appeals court - no jury trials are held in front of them either although the opposing lawyers for both sides can appear and deliver their respective arguments. Cases appealed to the state Supreme Court have reached their highest level at this point and the State Supreme Court's decision is final and binding. Cases can move out of the state courts system into the Federal court system ONLY if the case involves or contains some over-riding interest in, or conflict with, Federal law.
The right to over-rule what a group of people vote in. Below Statement wrote by Asedabres In a government way it is mainly the right of the president to over-rule the congresses choice of a bill or law sex
No. A court must have jurisdiction (the legal right to hear a case) over the parties, subject matter, and territory in order to render a binding decision. In fact, the court must have appropriate jurisdiction just to hear the case.
yes, If the parties involved agree that the decision made will be legally binding
No. If a custody action has been filed then the court has jurisdiction over the child and has the authority to render a decision. It would not be wise for the parent with present custody to flee.No. If a custody action has been filed then the court has jurisdiction over the child and has the authority to render a decision. It would not be wise for the parent with present custody to flee.No. If a custody action has been filed then the court has jurisdiction over the child and has the authority to render a decision. It would not be wise for the parent with present custody to flee.No. If a custody action has been filed then the court has jurisdiction over the child and has the authority to render a decision. It would not be wise for the parent with present custody to flee.
The Supreme Court must have a simple majority to render a decision in a case.
The judge will render a decision based on the length of the marriage, the needs of the parties, the ability of each to acquire assets, the economic levels of the parties, state laws, etc.
Normally the parties, not the court, files the judgment. There is no time requirement for the judge to RENDER a decision.
Yes. Adjudication is the legal process to settle a dispute. It is the act of a court, or other arbiter, to hear and settle a case and render a decision, order, judgment, or decree.Yes. Adjudication is the legal process to settle a dispute. It is the act of a court, or other arbiter, to hear and settle a case and render a decision, order, judgment, or decree.Yes. Adjudication is the legal process to settle a dispute. It is the act of a court, or other arbiter, to hear and settle a case and render a decision, order, judgment, or decree.Yes. Adjudication is the legal process to settle a dispute. It is the act of a court, or other arbiter, to hear and settle a case and render a decision, order, judgment, or decree.
Yes. A court has the authority to render that type of decision.Yes. A court has the authority to render that type of decision.Yes. A court has the authority to render that type of decision.Yes. A court has the authority to render that type of decision.
The court will hear the mother's objection and render a decision.The court will hear the mother's objection and render a decision.The court will hear the mother's objection and render a decision.The court will hear the mother's objection and render a decision.
Yes. After considering all the testimony the judge can render a decision that the trip is in the best interest of the child.Yes. After considering all the testimony the judge can render a decision that the trip is in the best interest of the child.Yes. After considering all the testimony the judge can render a decision that the trip is in the best interest of the child.Yes. After considering all the testimony the judge can render a decision that the trip is in the best interest of the child.
The case is tried in a trial court - If the outcome is not satisfactory to one of the parties to the case, it may appealed to the Court of Appeals. The Appeals Court will review the case and IF THEY WISH TO ACCEPT IT for review, they will consider the case and render a decision on the question contained in the appeal. If that appeal is not satisfactory to one of the parties in the case, that ruling may be appealed, yet again, to the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court chooses to accept the case, they, too, will hear the case and render a decision. The Supreme Court's decision is the final word and there is no higher appeal.
Yes, it happens quite frequently. If the judge holds a hearing at which both sides present their evidence, information and documentation, if it is clear, under the law, which party is the prevailing party, the judge can render a legally binding decision. If you do not agree you may file an appeal to the judge's decision.