What are written sources?

Updated: 4/28/2022
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Best Answer

Written sources are official reports, files, court documents, financial papers, news papers, or official files.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are written sources?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Continue Learning about American Government

Is bias a secondary source?

Bias is not a secondary source. In terms of historical and academic research and writing, secondary sources are articles and books written by historians and other academics. Secondary sources can be biased based on when the source was written and the author.Ê

Are primary sources always correct?

Primary sources are usually accurate considering they were written by someone at who witnessed a historical event personally, however some may be inaccurate due to human error.

Primary sources sources of information used by historians are?

Sources of information about history are what is written, what is said, and what is physically preserved. These sources include original documents, autobiographies, memoirs, published source collections, essays, books, letters, diaries, artifacts, newspapers, historical photos, journals, documentary films, oral testimony, censuses, tax records, and city directories.

Why must students of history learn to evaluate historical sources?

Historical sources for records should always be evaluated because not all historical sources are equal in terms of accuracy or purpose. Sources fall into three basic categories: (1) sources that are indisputable; (2) sources that contain unintentional errors; and (3) sources that are deliberate falsehoods and have an ulterior purpose. Humans aren't perfect and it was common to make accidental mistakes when writing things down. If a historian uses sources, his unintentional errors can be remedied. Often, a writer could have had an ulterior motive in writing a record in a certain way. This happened frequently. What it means, is that a person may have had a hidden agenda while recording their version and deliberately left out information or actually made up information that seems to support what they have written. If they don't have sources, their writing should not be considered reliable. If their writing goes against the mainstream thought, their sources should be carefully analyzed to see if they should be given any weight. Thirdly, there are different kinds of sources. Some sources can be relied upon absolutely, like wills, and court records because they are, by their nature, factual and unbiased; while others, such as a written version of an oral history, aren't such good proof. To be able to write or talk about a historical event accurately, a student of history should always dig below the surface to verify information by looking at the number of sources, the quality of sources, and the type of source. A student of history cannot be taken seriously by others if he doesn't have good sources to support his position.

Which problem with reading primary historical sources is best illustrated by the Mayflower Compact?

Historical events that happened immediately before the writing can influence the written material while the material itself fails to mention these events.

Related questions

What has the author Joseph Satin written?

Joseph Satin has written: 'Shakespeare and his sources' -- subject(s): Sources 'The humanities handbook'

What is non written sources?

It is an interpretation

What has the author Adelaide Duncan Estill written?

Adelaide Duncan Estill has written: 'The sources of Synge' -- subject(s): In literature, Sources

What has the author Del Moore written?

Del Moore has written: 'Bibliography of Jamestown sources' -- subject(s): Bibliography, History, Sources

What has the author Vassilios Christides written?

Vassilios Christides has written: 'The image of Cyprus in the Arabic sources' -- subject(s): History, Sources

Why do you rely on archaeologists rather than written sources to learn about prehistory?

The word "prehistory" implies "before writing existed". There are no "written sources" from that time.

What has the author Rachel Fell McDermott written?

Rachel Fell McDermott has written: 'Sources of Indian tradition' -- subject- s -: Sources, Civilization, History

What has the author Aloys Fleischman written?

Aloys Fleischman has written: 'A Key to Sources of Irish Traditional Music' -- subject(s): Folk music, Sources

Why are secondary sources important to the study of history?

These sources provide information written by other authors.

What has the author Brahmadeva Prasad Ambashthya written?

Brahmadeva Prasad Ambashthya has written: 'Non-Persian sources on Indian medieval history' -- subject(s): History, Sources 'Non-Persian sources of Indian medieval history' -- subject(s): History, Sources

What has the author Arthur Charlesby written?

Arthur Charlesby has written: 'Radiation sources'

What has the author Stanton D Anderson written?

Stanton D Anderson has written: 'New and renewable sources of energy' -- subject(s): Renewable energy sources