Best Answer

Try 13 and 74. They are still long but relatively shorter than the others. Thank you very large.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What federalist essay was the shortest?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

What was the shortest lived political party?

The Federalist party

In what essay did James madison wrote about his concern over factions?

Federalist 10

What federalist essay did Alexander Hamilton argue in support of judicial review?

In Federalist Paper no. 78, Hamilton argues in support of judicial review.

Who was the author of the Federalist papers N 10?

James Madison wrote essay #10.

The essay urging ratification during New York ratification debates were known as?

The federalist paper supported it The anti-federalist papers opposed it

Was edward heyward federalist or anti-federalist?


Was James Wilson a federalist?

Yes No. Only when he was writing the Federalist Papers. After that he was an anti-Federalist supporter of Jefferson.

Was Jonathan Smith a federalist or anti federalist?

Jacob broom is a unicorn

Was Luther martin a federalist or anti-federalist?

He is a Federalist!

Was John Hancock an Anti-federalist or a Federalist?

We was a Federalist

John smilie federalist or anti federalist?

John Smilie is an Anti-Federalist

What does Federalist paper 46 mean?

Federalist No. 46 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-sixth of the Federalist Papers. It was published on January 29, 1788 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all the Federalist Papers were published. This essay examines the relative strength of the state and federal governments under the proposed United States Constitution. It is titled, "The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared." Madison stresses that the federal and state governments are two totally different agencies. He articulates that they are separate yet can collaborate together, and that the power lies in the people. The natural attachment of the people will always be to the governments of their respective states, so the federal government must be, in a sense, extraordinarily congenial to the people.