0
What following amendments in the Bill of Rights do both Justice Fortas and Justice Black refer to?
The First Amendment
What else can I help you with?
Which of the following amendments to the Constitution does not address or guarantee voting rights?
Which of the following amendments to the Constitution does NOT address or guarantee voting rights?That would be the 7th Amendment.7th Amendment
Why are the fourteeth and fifteeth amendments considered the greatest achievements of reconstruction?
Because those amendments did the following:14-Provided definition of citizenship and civil rights1-Voting rights for blacks.
The bill of rights that went into effect in 1791 had how many amendments?
The Bill of Rights that went into effect in 1791 had ten amendments. Since this time there has been 17 new amendments added to the Bill of Rights. Today this document contains 27 amendments.
The bill of rights consists of how many amendments to the constitution?
The Bill of Rights consist of the first ten amendments.
What protects the rights of U.S. citizens from the federal government?
The Bill of Rights
What Amendments in the Bill of Rights Do both justice fortas and justice black refer to?
the First Amendment
What amendment in the bill of rights do justice Fortas and justice black refer to?
The First Amendment
How did justice fortas concept of pure speech extend first amendment free speech rights?
How did Justice Fortas's concept of "pure speech" extend First Amendment free speech rights?
What amendments do justice Fortas and justice black refer to?
Justices Fortas and Black often referred to the First Amendment, which protects freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, which addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law. Fortas emphasized the importance of free speech and the need to protect unpopular viewpoints, while Black advocated for a strict interpretation of the Constitution to ensure civil liberties. Their discussions often revolved around how these amendments relate to individual rights and the role of the government in safeguarding them.
Which of the following amendments to the Constitution does not address or guarantee voting rights?
Which of the following amendments to the Constitution does NOT address or guarantee voting rights?That would be the 7th Amendment.7th Amendment
What are two of Justice Fortas's basic reasons for ruling in favor of the students?
Justice Fortas ruled in favor of the students in Tinker v. Des Moines because he believed that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate" and that the students' armbands did not cause a substantial disruption to the school environment.
What are the first amendents called?
The first three amendments are part of the Bill of Rights, along with the 7 amendments following them.
What are the first three amendment called?
The first three amendments are part of the Bill of Rights, along with the 7 amendments following them.
Which amendments extended individual rights?
The following amendments extended individual rights. The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 14th amendments all extended individual rights.
What amendments of the bill of rights pertain to the criminal justice system?
The 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th amendments. i,ii,iii, iv.
Can the bill of rights be altered?
The Bill of Rights is itself a collection of 10 amendments to the Constitution. Because of this, the Bill of Rights does not get amended, but it's possible to pass amendments that cancel other amendments (like the 18th and 21st amendments). So, if someone wanted to change the Bill of Rights, they could (in theory, at least) try to get an amendment passed that modified one of the amendments contained within the Bill of Rights.
Do you agree more with Justice Fortas and opinion or Justice Black and dissent Give reasons for your answer.?
I lean more toward Justice Fortas's opinion, as it emphasizes the importance of protecting individual rights and freedoms under the Constitution, particularly in the context of due process. Fortas's perspective acknowledges the evolving nature of society and the necessity of adapting legal interpretations to safeguard personal liberties. In contrast, Justice Black's dissent, while advocating for strict adherence to constitutional text, may overlook the practical implications of rigid interpretations in contemporary contexts. Balancing foundational principles with the realities of modern governance is crucial for a just legal system.
