Conflict of interest
The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)
this would be an example of checks and balances.
The congress of the White House
an example would be that the legislative branch makes the law and the executive branch enforces the law it would mean that each branch has a check on the other branch to make sure they are all equal bajo says no!!!!!!!
Conflict of interest
The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)
Being the majority party in congress is simply have any number more then half of the whole party. Like the senate for example if there are 51/49 vote the 51 votes are the majority party.
Yes, it is possible for the party of the president and the majority party of the congress to be different. This scenario is known as divided government, and it can lead to challenges in passing legislation and governance due to party differences and potential gridlock.
The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)
The 'lame duck' term indicates the period in a presidency that the US President is no longer actively pushing through legislation or getting any major policies off the ground. Most commonly that happens when he is losing influence because he is sure to be on the way out, usually in the last one or two years of his second term when he can no longer be reelected. Another instance can be a period when the President has no majority in Congress and his opponents are actively working to block anything that might make him realize his plans and policies. It can also refer to the US Congress as an example. The current US Congress has a majority of Republicans and a majority of Democrats in the Senate. The newly elected Congress will have a majority in the Senate of Republicans and an overwhelming majority of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
The best example of checks and balances is that the president can veto any bill passed by Congress, but a two-thirds vote in Congress can override the veto.
Education is an example of man versus society conflict.
There is no such thing as a "majority president". A person who runs for the office runs as a canadate for one of two parites. At various times the Congress is controlled by one party, but this is not the case at all times. For example when Obama came into office the Democrats had the majority, but now it is the Republicans. Your question implies that a president who holds the majority can get things done. This is sometimes true, but not always true.
Congress!
this would be an example of checks and balances.
One example is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is fueled by religious differences between Jews and Muslims over control of the Holy Land. Another example is the sectarian violence between Sunni and Shia Muslims in countries like Iraq and Syria, where differing interpretations of Islam have led to conflict and instability.