consensus building
Conflict of interest
The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)
this would be an example of checks and balances.
The congress of the White House
an example would be that the legislative branch makes the law and the executive branch enforces the law it would mean that each branch has a check on the other branch to make sure they are all equal bajo says no!!!!!!!
Conflict of interest
The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)
Being the majority party in congress is simply have any number more then half of the whole party. Like the senate for example if there are 51/49 vote the 51 votes are the majority party.
Yes, but the majority party (not of congress- just what is considered the majority party according to laws) is determined by the executive branch aka the president.The most recent example, while Bush was still in office the democrats took control of Congress, but the majority party of the country was still considered Republican. Currently our President (Obama) as well as the majority of Congress are Democrat but if at their next election Congress shifts to a majority of Republicans the country's majority party would still be considered the Democrats, because of the presidentAdded: The initial answer is incorrect. The majority party in Congress is ALWAYS the numerically superior party, regardless of WHO the President is. The President has nothing whatsoever to do with naming the majority party, the voters decide who it will be by putting more members of one party in office, rather than the other.
The president vetoes a law passed by Congress, but Congress overrides the veto with a two-thirds majority vote. (APEX)
The 'lame duck' term indicates the period in a presidency that the US President is no longer actively pushing through legislation or getting any major policies off the ground. Most commonly that happens when he is losing influence because he is sure to be on the way out, usually in the last one or two years of his second term when he can no longer be reelected. Another instance can be a period when the President has no majority in Congress and his opponents are actively working to block anything that might make him realize his plans and policies. It can also refer to the US Congress as an example. The current US Congress has a majority of Republicans and a majority of Democrats in the Senate. The newly elected Congress will have a majority in the Senate of Republicans and an overwhelming majority of Republicans in the House of Representatives.
The best example of checks and balances is that the president can veto any bill passed by Congress, but a two-thirds vote in Congress can override the veto.
Congress!
Education is an example of man versus society conflict.
this would be an example of checks and balances.
There is no such thing as a "majority president". A person who runs for the office runs as a canadate for one of two parites. At various times the Congress is controlled by one party, but this is not the case at all times. For example when Obama came into office the Democrats had the majority, but now it is the Republicans. Your question implies that a president who holds the majority can get things done. This is sometimes true, but not always true.
AnswerAn early example of religion and conflict was the crusades. A modern example of religion and conflict is jihad. Some may say that the conflict between Israel and Palestine is an example of religious conflict, but this is probably more about land and ethnic pride.