0
The Federalists utilized a strategic approach to ratify the Constitution by engaging in a campaign of public persuasion through essays and pamphlets, notably the "Federalist Papers," which were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. They emphasized the need for a stronger central government to maintain order and protect liberties, addressing concerns raised by opponents. Additionally, they focused on securing the support of key states through targeted advocacy and compromises, ultimately leading to the Constitution's ratification by the necessary nine states.
What else can I help you with?
Use the word ratify in a sentence?
many people refuse to RATIFY the Constitution because they thought that it did not protect their rights
How did the federalists and anti-federalists settle their differences?
The Federalists wished to grant some definite power to the new American government, which would enable them to manage their own affairs without having to beg the various states to go along. The anti-Federalists feared that the government might use its powers to eliminate the liberties of the people. They finally agreed on a Bill of Rights, incorporated into the Constitution itself. The Federalists had protested that since the Constitution didn't give the Federal government power to perform some actions, that the government wouldn't be able to do that; the anti-Federalists wanted explicit guarantees. So the Anti-federalists gained specific rights for the people, rights that the Federalists had said were never in any danger. History has proven that the Anti-Federalists were correct, and the Federalists were naive in the extreme; government ALWAYS gathers more powers than its founders had intended.
What process did states use to decide whether to ratify the Constitution?
They held conventions where representatives voted for or against ratification
What were two arguments antifederlists made for rejecting the constitution?
One argument anti-federalists made for rejecting the Constitution was that they viewed the Constitution as giving the national government too much power (which they had just fought a revolution over trying to free themselves from the grasp of a foreign government that had an extremely centralized government) and not enough power to the states. Another argument against the ratification of the Constitution was the use of a president to head the national government. They viewed this as a position where someone could have a lot of power, such as the King or Queen had in England.
What was the Anti-Federalists' greatest concern about ratifying the U.S. Constitution?
Generally speaking, anti-Federalists feared that a too powerful central government might conflict with the states ( former colonies ) own constitutions which guaranteed so many freedoms that were held sacred by state politicians, leaders and ordinary citizens. To overcome the fears of the anti-Federalists, James Madison was assigned the task to create a bill of rights that made sure that a too powerful central government would take away their rights. Madison came up with twelve amendments, however the Framers decided to use only ten of them.
Use the word ratify in a sentence?
many people refuse to RATIFY the Constitution because they thought that it did not protect their rights
What arguments did the federalists use to convince people to support the constitution?
The anti-federalists were opposed to the Constitution and actually wanted the Articles of Confederation to be revised if anything.Also, the Federalists (who wanted the constitution) wrote a series of essays to support the Constsitution and to inform people on why the Constitution is a good thing and that it will help America become a more stable country. Some writers are John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton.
Did the federalists use tough political maneuvering and the promise of a bill of rights to win a narrow ratification of the constitution in key states?
Niggar
Why did Anti-federalists oppose ratification to the constitution?
The Anti federalist didn't want to ratify the Constitution because they thought it took to much power away from the states. The Constitution called for a strong central government which meant that most of the powers would be held by the central government opposed to the state's government's. The Anti-Federalist also wanted a Bill of Rights with the Constitution to ensure the people rights.
How did the federalists and anti-federalists settle their differences?
The Federalists wished to grant some definite power to the new American government, which would enable them to manage their own affairs without having to beg the various states to go along. The anti-Federalists feared that the government might use its powers to eliminate the liberties of the people. They finally agreed on a Bill of Rights, incorporated into the Constitution itself. The Federalists had protested that since the Constitution didn't give the Federal government power to perform some actions, that the government wouldn't be able to do that; the anti-Federalists wanted explicit guarantees. So the Anti-federalists gained specific rights for the people, rights that the Federalists had said were never in any danger. History has proven that the Anti-Federalists were correct, and the Federalists were naive in the extreme; government ALWAYS gathers more powers than its founders had intended.
How do you use the word federalists in a sentence?
The federalists are gay.
Who were the Federalists and who were the Anti-federalists what were the issues that divided them and why did the federalists win?
The Federalists were supporters of the proposed U.S. Constitution, advocating for a strong central government to maintain order and promote economic stability. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution, fearing it granted too much power to the federal government at the expense of states' rights and individual liberties. Key issues dividing them included the balance of power, the lack of a Bill of Rights, and the fear of tyranny. The Federalists ultimately triumphed due to their organized campaigns, effective use of propaganda, and the promise of amendments, including the Bill of Rights, to address Anti-Federalist concerns.
What arguments did the federalists use against having a bill of rights?
The argument of the federalists is that the constitution gave the nationalists the strong national government that had wanted. Federalists felt that the Constitution provided the necessary protection already and the Bill of Rights was unnecessary. Also, the Bill of Rights pointed out rights that the government didnt have, therefore outlining the powers the government didnt have gave the appearance that the government had more powers than it actually did.
Which method of amending the constitution has been use for all but one of its formal amendments?
The method of formal amendment that has only been used once is by a proposition by Congress and ratification by conventions, called for that purpose, in 3/4 of the states. The only time it was used was for the 21st amendment of the Constitution.
What did the federalists use to support this argument?
they wrote the federalists essays in which they pleaded their case
What were the weaknesses in the Anti-Federalists' arguments against the Constitution?
Articles of Confederation and Shay's Rebellion Even though they didn't like the constitution, they didn't have a solution for their problem. you could use Thomas Hobbs and say that people in general are self interested there are a lot more you just have to look it up.
What were the main arguments use the Anti- Federalists?
Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?
