answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The clause that declared that a man's property was sacred.

The court decided that the Founding Fathers would have included slaves within their defintiion of property.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What part of the constitution was involved in the dred Scott v Sandford case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What case did the fourteenth amendment overrule?

It overruled Marbury v. Madison


What US Supreme Court case attempted to settle the slavery question?

Dred Scott v. Sanford*, 60 US 393 (1857)In the Dred Scott decision, the Court held that people who had been slaves, or who descended from slaves, were not protected by the Constitution and could never be US citizens. Without citizenship status, African-Americans were denied access to the courts, and couldn't sue for their freedom, even if they had a contractual agreement granting them free status.The Supreme Court also ruled that Congress had no right to prohibit slavery, nullifying the Missouri Compromise.The Court's decision in this case was overturned by the Thirteenth Amendment, prohibiting slavery.* The name Sanford is misspelled as Sandford in US ReportsFor more information, see Related Questions, below.


Which court case did the Supreme Court declare the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional?

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)The court case was Dred Scott v. Sandford, in 1857.For more information, see Related Questions, below.


How was the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional?

It was only unconstitutional if you accepted Roger Taney's interpretation of the Constitution in his judgment of the Dred Scott case in 1857. He said the Constitution protected slavery - so therefore no state could declare itself to be free soil.


Which supreme court case ruled that slaves were property?

Dred Scott v. Sanford*, 60 US 393 (1857)In the Dred Scott decision, the Court held that slaves were chattel (property). Slaves, as well as people who had been slaves, or who descended from slaves, were not protected by the Constitution and could never be US citizens. Without citizenship status, African-Americans were denied access to the courts, and couldn't sue for their freedom, even if they had a contractual agreement granting them free status.The Supreme Court also ruled that Congress had no right to prohibit slavery, nullifying the Missouri Compromise.The Court's decision in this case was overturned by the Thirteenth Amendment, prohibiting slavery.* The name Sanford is misspelled as "Sandford" in US ReportsAnswerThat was the Dred Scott decision - concerning the status of a slave who had been taken on to free soil, and then back to slave country.The Supreme Court declared that a black man should have no business suing a white man.More ominously, it also ruled that slavery was protected by the Constitution. Taken literally, this would mean that there was no such thing as free soil.These two aspects of the Supreme Court ruling helped to raise the temperature of the debate, and made war virtually inevitable.For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Related questions

Who was the slave that sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott vs Sandford?

Dred Scott


What was the proper name for the Dred Scott case?

Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857)The short title is Scott v. Sandford, but the case is often referred to colloquially as "the Dred Scott case." Sandford is misspelled in the Supreme Court documents; the proper spelling is Sanford, without a d. This cannot be corrected, however.


Does this case remain relevant during Dred Scott v Sandford case?

No, the 14th Amendment supersedes the Dred Scott decision.


What yeard did dred Scott suprteme court case is decided?

Dred Scott v. Sandford : 1857 .


What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

That Scott had no right to argue in court


Did the dred Scott v sandford case decide that racial segrewgation in public places was constitutional?

Yes, it confirmed that - both in its reading of the Constitution, and in further comments attached to the judgment.


Which case centered on the issue of who was a slave and who was free?

Dred Scott vs sandford


What case determined African Americans were not slaves?

Dred Scott v. Sandford


What case did the fourteenth amendment overrule?

It overruled Marbury v. Madison


Who was the known slave that sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott vs Sandford?

Dred Scott was the known slave who sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott v. Sandford. The Supreme Court decision ruled against Scott, stating that as a slave, he was not a US citizen and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision further fueled tensions over slavery in the US leading up to the Civil War.


Which Supreme Court case ruled that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights?

Dred Scott v. Sandford


Slave who sued for his freedom?

Dred Scott was a slave who sued for his freedom in the United States. The Supreme Court's decision in the case, known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, ultimately ruled against him in 1857, determining that slaves were property and not entitled to citizenship or freedom under the Constitution.