0
John C. Calhoun argued that the tariffs violated equal rights. According to his perspective, tariffs not only favored the northern states, but also harmed the southern states. Imported goods hurt the income of all people in South Carolina. As far as Calhoun was concerned, helping support the northern industrial base was not the purpose of the federal government.
What else can I help you with?
Why did Southerners argue states' rights were violated by abolition of slavery?
Southerners argued that the abolition of slavery violated states' rights because they believed that each state had the authority to determine its own laws and governance, including the legality of slavery. They contended that the federal government overstepped its constitutional boundaries by interfering in what they viewed as a state matter. This perspective was rooted in a broader belief in the sovereignty of states and a resistance to federal authority. Thus, they framed the abolition of slavery as an infringement on their rights and autonomy as states.
Why would many people who opposed the constitution argue for a bill of rights?
People that opposed the US Constitution argued in favor of the Bill of Rights. They felt the constitution itself would give all powers to the government officials and jeopardize the freedoms of the people. The Bill of Rights laid clear understanding that these rights and freedoms of the people could not be violated regardless of the actions of the government officials.
Declaration of Independence could this document be used to argue for quitting?
The Declaration of Independence document can be used to argue for quitting. The Declaration of Independence document is used only for Theory and Natural rights.
Which constitutional provision according to some people was violated when the U.S. government interned (confined) Japanese-Americans during World War 2?
Many people argue that the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II violated the Fifth Amendment, which guarantees due process and prohibits the government from depriving individuals of liberty without lawful reason. Additionally, the internment is often viewed as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, as it specifically targeted individuals based on their race and ethnicity, rather than any legitimate security threat. This action has been widely condemned as a grave injustice and a violation of civil rights.
The main purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to?
2
A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if what?
A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if
A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if?
Democrates
What rights did John c. Calhoun argue that tariffs violated?
John C. Calhoun argued that the tariffs violated equal rights. According to his perspective, tariffs not only favored the northern states, but also harmed the southern states. Imported goods hurt the income of all people in South Carolina. As far as Calhoun was concerned, helping support the northern industrial base was not the purpose of the federal government.
Why did the British argue that the banning of the opium trade by Chinese authorities in 1839 was wrong because it violated?
The British argued that the banning of the opium trade by Chinese authorities in 1839 was wrong because it violated the idea of freedom of commerce. They also argued that it violated the rights of Chinese citizens to do as they pleased.
What grounds did homer Plessy argue that his rights under the fourteenth amendment had been violated?
That separating the races implied involuntary servitude and inferiority rather than equality
What did anti-protectionists argue was a harmful effect of tariffs?
Higher prices of foreign goods
Should criminals have the vote?
This is a controversial topic with arguments on both sides. Some believe that all citizens should have the right to vote, regardless of their past actions. Others argue that criminals have violated the social contract and should have their voting rights revoked as part of their punishment.
Which act of the parliament caused the colonists to argue that the British had violated the principle of taxation with representation?
the stamp act
Why did Southerners argue states' rights were violated by abolition of slavery?
Southerners argued that the abolition of slavery violated states' rights because they believed that each state had the authority to determine its own laws and governance, including the legality of slavery. They contended that the federal government overstepped its constitutional boundaries by interfering in what they viewed as a state matter. This perspective was rooted in a broader belief in the sovereignty of states and a resistance to federal authority. Thus, they framed the abolition of slavery as an infringement on their rights and autonomy as states.
Those who favor protective tariffs argue that?
protecting domestic industries from foreign competition. all of the above (NovaNet)
Why did Daniel Webster and john c calhoun of North Carolina argue about while serving in the us house of representatives?
They were arguing about the slavery and tariffs of the country. Webster opposed tariffs at first, but then came to like them for the industry
How would Richard fitzhugh react to high tariff?
Richard Fitzhugh, a prominent Virginia plantation owner and proponent of the Southern economy, would likely react negatively to high tariffs. He would argue that such tariffs disproportionately harm the South by raising the cost of imported goods and stifling trade, particularly with Europe. Fitzhugh believed in an agrarian economy reliant on exports, so he would view high tariffs as detrimental to the profitability of Southern agriculture and a violation of states' rights. His views would align with the broader Southern opposition to tariffs during the antebellum period.
