Military force is using "the military", trained and armed soldiers, to accomplish a goal.
Military force is obviously used in wars, but it is also used in peacetime to control large crowds. It is also used when hostile action is taken, but war is not formally declared.
For example, the United States is not at war with Iraq. Nevertheless, we use military force, with the Iraqi government's permission, to keep the peace there.
put down nullification with military force
a ground unit in an air force comparable to a platoon
allowed the president to use military to enforce acts of congress
A conscientious objector is a person who disapproves of military force on moral grounds. Objectors are often allowed to forego military service during a draft. They are sometimes tasked with a government position that does not involve the military.
Generally speaking a violent takeover of a government by an absolute ruler is termed a dictatorship. This type of government has many variations, however, the main result of this is clearly a dictatorship.
Presidents can back up their foreign policy decisions with hard power. A good example of hard power is through the use of military force.
No. No military force can approach democracy. Such a system would be untenable.
If it is a government military of a nation for example: British Army, United States Marine Corps, Royal Australian Air Force etc then the Government Defence budjet would be their financial source. If its a private military they would get profit and income revenue from their clients and possibly other sources.
This is the Turkish military, fourth largest military force in the World.
You have to be in the military first-preferably Air Force.
it depends in which context. If you mean force such as gravity , it would be "grym" If you mean in the military sense , it would be "byddin"
Assuming that the legal civilian government has directed them to use force, yes. If you are wondering about the political implications of using military force in that manner then a political forum would be a better location for this question.
No. Archers were equivalent to what would be field artillery in a modern military force.
In the US, that would be the National Guard.
A military force that fights on land is the army for that is what they were first assigned to do.
A repelling force is a force that pushes two objects away from each other. For example, the electromagnetic force between two positively charged particles would be repelling.
For example, the instrument to measure the force may have a spring. The elongation (extension) of the spring would be proportional to the force.