The government should be changed when it no longer represents the will of the people, fails to uphold justice and equality, or consistently undermines fundamental rights and freedoms. Additionally, systemic corruption, persistent economic decline, or a lack of accountability can also warrant a change in government. Ultimately, a shift is necessary when the governing body is unable or unwilling to address the needs and aspirations of its citizens effectively. Regular democratic processes, such as elections, provide a means for this change.
It means that with thought toward the future, a government should not be changed for causes that aren't significant.
In my opinion, it's a toss up between: "all men [sic] are born equally free and independent" (George Mason, Virginia Declaration of Rights); and, the people have the right to alter or abolish government.
Thomas Jefferson's statement that government should not be changed for "light and transient causes" emphasizes the importance of stability and seriousness in governance. He suggests that alterations to government should be based on significant, enduring issues rather than temporary grievances or fleeting emotions. This principle underscores the need for careful deliberation and a strong rationale when considering fundamental changes to political structures, ensuring that such decisions are made with the welfare of society in mind.
None of the constitution can be changed unless there is a convention called and everyone votes on it
the structure of the federal government
Should the Philippine Government be changed to parliamentary form?
From the very start there were two thoughts of how government should be and these developed into political parties. Through the years they have changed names, and changed ideas about government.
Government receives its power from the people and should be changed if it does not ensure their safety and happiness.
Government receives its power from the people and should be changed if it does not ensure their safety and happiness.
Government receives its power from the people and should be changed if it does not ensure their safety and happiness.
It means that with thought toward the future, a government should not be changed for causes that aren't significant.
In my opinion, it's a toss up between: "all men [sic] are born equally free and independent" (George Mason, Virginia Declaration of Rights); and, the people have the right to alter or abolish government.
How has westernization changed Turkey's government culture and economy
By elections
Islam did not really change, the only way or reason it changed was the way the government changed it.
it was changed to democracy
It was DMK Government headed by M. Karunanidhi.