U.S. Presidential candidates campaign to the American people, then the electoral college is appointed based on the popular vote in each state.
There are four decision makers in deciding which candidates get party campaign funds for senatorial election. These include the national chairman, the party caucus, the national convention chair, and the chair of the senatorial campaign committee.
Third-party presidential candidates can receive federal funds if their party received at least five percent of the vote in the previous presidential election.
Election campaigns and other political processes in which candidates, not political parties, have most of the initiative and influence.
Political party loyalties began to cut across State loyalties, creating new problems, such as electoral ties within the same party.
and its past voter support for party candidates (awarded bonus delegates)
The party leaders were the ones that chose the list of major-party candidates for president and vice-president. The candidates were then voted on by the electoral college.
Third party candidates have a difficult time winning electoral votes
The electoral college has absolutely nothing to do with nominating process for US presidential and vice presidential candidates. Each political party controls its own process of nominations limited only by the level of cooperation from each of the states.
There are four decision makers in deciding which candidates get party campaign funds for senatorial election. These include the national chairman, the party caucus, the national convention chair, and the chair of the senatorial campaign committee.
There are four decision makers in deciding which candidates get party campaign funds for senatorial election. These include the national chairman, the party caucus, the national convention chair, and the chair of the senatorial campaign committee.
all of the above this is for plato
There are two sides to this question. First, the electoral college allows presidential candidates to focus on certain states that they need to swing. We if did not have the electoral college, presidential candidates would have to go to the areas where there party is more dense to get the votes they need, which would make things complicated. The other side to it is that a president might be selected without winning the popular vote. This unraveled before our own eyes in 2000 when even though Gore won the popular vote, Bush won the electoral college and hence won the presidency. Hope this helped you to take a side.
There are two sides to this question. First, the electoral college allows presidential candidates to focus on certain states that they need to swing. We if did not have the electoral college, presidential candidates would have to go to the areas where there party is more dense to get the votes they need, which would make things complicated. The other side to it is that a president might be selected without winning the popular vote. This unraveled before our own eyes in 2000 when even though Gore won the popular vote, Bush won the electoral college and hence won the presidency. Hope this helped you to take a side.
The first presidential election in which the District of Columbia participated was the election of 1964. Since the passage of this amendment, the District's electoral votes have been cast for the Democratic Party's presidential and vice-presidential candidates in every election.
Third-party presidential candidates can receive federal funds if their party received at least five percent of the vote in the previous presidential election.
The numbers are the amount of votes a state has in the electoral college. A candidate must receive more than half of electoral votes in order to become president. In 2012, this means they must receive 270 electoral votes in order to become president.
Theodore Roosevelt received 88 electoral college votes running as under the Progressive Party (Bull-Moose Party). William Howard Taft (Republican) only received 8 electoral college votes. Woodrow Wilson recived 435 votes and won the presidencey.H. Ross Perot was one of the most successful third-party presidential candidates in U.S. history, having won almost 19 percent of the popular vote in the 1992 election while running as an independent But, received none of the electoral college vote.. He garnered only 8 percent of the popular vote in 1996 as a candidate of the Reform Party.