Political parties began to effect the outcome of some of the Electoral College results. There were ties due to political loyalties.
They take votes away from major parties candidates.
Political parties have unified groups of people and helped them seek and achieve common goals. They help to offer voters choices. Just as people have a favorite sports team that they tend to favor, political parties give people something to identify with. Political parties tend to control who get what, where, when, and how much. Their major purpose for existence is to get people to elect their candidates. Political parties tend to attract people based on their performances and their political platforms. What the promise and what they accomplish while being in office largely determine which coalitions will affiliate with their party in the next elections. So even though elections between political parties can be heated they have served as a way for people to identify with government and best express their individual voice.
Minor parties take votes away from the candidates of other parties.
Arguments for the Electoral College are that: - it contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president. - it enhances the status of minority interests. - it contributes to the political stability of the nation by encouraging a two-party system. - it maintains a federal system of government and representation. Arguments against the Electoral College are that: - it diminishes the principle of one vote per person, by giving the population of small states more electoral votes than an equivalent population in a large in a large state would receive - it can award victory to the candidate who wins the electoral but not the popular vote - a candidate who wins the electoral but not the popular vote may have a lasting problem of legitimacy as president. The indefensible reality is that more than 99% of campaign attention (ad spending and visits) was showered on voters in just ten states in 2012- and that in today's political climate, the swing states have become increasingly fewer and fixed. Where you live determines how much, if at all, your vote matters. The current state-by-state winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes (not mentioned in the US Constitution, but later enacted by 48 states), ensures that the candidates, after the conventions, will not reach out to about 80% of the states and their voters. Candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or care about the voter concerns in the dozens of states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. It would only take winning a bare plurality of popular votes in just the 11 most populous states, containing 56% of the population of the United States, for a candidate to win the Presidency with a mere 23% of the nation's votes! This is somewhat obviated by the current political disagreements between some of these states.
Political parties began to effect the outcome of some of the Electoral College results. There were ties due to political loyalties.
Political parties didn't exist in1796. They really hadn't formed, but there were political fractions concerning how government should be run.
They take votes away from major parties candidates.
Presidents of the US are elected by the electoral college, they are not elected directly by the public. The public (in effect) elects the electors who form the electoral college. It has happened on several occasions that the winner of the popular vote was not the winner in the electoral college.
They take votes away from major parties candidates.
They take votes away from major parties candidates.
They had no effect on the election of a president but had complete control of who would be vice-president.
Leaders tried to build support for their views by organizing political parties.
it caused the national unity to become more difficult
In the past few years, the effect that political parties have influence American life even more. The right and the left are more partisan than in many years causing partisanship among citizens.
Leaders tried to build support for their views by organizing political parties.
Zana Kh. GulmohamadPolitical parties have a significant impact in forming the government. Political parties aim to influence governments, particularly in countries which have democratic systems. For the last century political parties have been involved in forming and establishing governments in many countries . Here the focus is on the effect of political parties on the governing process in liberal democratic countries because in many ways they represent the power of the people. Although there are different views to what extent the political parties represent the people.However, political parties have an influence on the government's decisions and behaviour. The political parties have effects on government process through various channels such as parliament, mass media, its members, branch and organisations, party conferences, and people's ideologies. The latter can be effective in situations such as people demonstrations, protest...ectThe impact of political parties on the governing process also depends on the political systems of the country such as the institutions ..ect. In countries where one party wins the election they form the government and they implement their program. In a coalition government which involve more then one political party the situation is much more complicated. Thus, the political parties have to agree on a program which can be adopted.Zana Gulmohamad