the successful party was the democrats party because hoover was doing a bad job with the Great depression so Franklin Roosevelt promised he would do a better job so he is now president
by chase.s
Democratic.
Election-oriented means that a party is focused on getting elected for an office. Issue-oriented means that a party is more focused on a certain political issue. So saying that the major parties are more election-oriented means that they put their efforts into getting candidates from their party elected, not just getting the public focused on an issue.
I found your question hard to understand, so I may not have answered it. More people vote in the presidential election years than in the off-year Congressional elections.
In a way, neither. The federalist party shared a fair amount of the "common good's" ordeals shared by the modern Democratic party. However, after the elections in the early 1800s and after President Adams' term, the Federalist party began to fade away, leaving only past members there, which was very few. To simplify: more modern democratic than modern republican in serving ALL people.
Throughout world history there have been thousands and thousands of elections. Everything from class presidents in schools to heads of states in countries. To take just one type of election in one country, there have been 57 U.S. Presidential elections, and the U.S. has had 44 Presidents. Other countries have had more elections. Then you have elections for all sorts of other positions in countries, towns, cities, organisations etc. So it would not be known how many elections there have been.
The Democratic Party was more successful in the 1932 elections. Its candidate, Franklin D. Roosevelt, won the presidential election by a wide margin, defeating the incumbent Republican President Herbert Hoover. The Democrats also gained a significant majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
Republicans
I think the answer to that is Republicans.
We have elections because its time for the people To vote in a new or old president, mayor, and even more
Democratic.
there are more independent voters and people are now more educated to the corrupt nature of parties
Yes they did. In the 1933 elections, Hitler's NSDAP party got more than 43% of the votes, making his party the biggest in Germany by far.
raises cash for candidates,provides pr support n more
The party's rise to power was rapid. Before the economic depression struck, the Nazis were practically unknown, winning only 3 percent of the vote to the Reichstag (German parliament) in elections in 1924. In the 1932 elections, the Nazis won 37 percent of the votes, more than any other party. In January 1933 Hitler was appointed chancellor, the head of the German government, and many Germans believed that they had found a savior for their nation http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007671
Libertarians
The urban political machines were no more than a political party organized on the grassroots level. They exsisted to win elections and reward its followers with jobs on the city's pallroll. The urban political machines were no more than a political party organized on the grassroots level. They exsisted to win elections and reward its followers with jobs on the city's pallroll.
A party or candidate is required to obey all laws that apply to them during the election. If you are asking about election regulations and campaign contributions, you'd have to be more specific.