answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The man most against it was Vice-President John C. Calhoun who resigned his post in order to run for the Senate. Andrew Jackson signed the bill for this tariff which was a reduction over the tariff of 1828. It was mostly written by ex-President John Quincy Adams. I do not know of any past or future presidents who actively were against it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

It was John C. Calhoun

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who lead the fight against the tariff of abominations?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

The vice president who resigned to lead the fight against the 1832 tariff was?

John C. Calhoun


Which southern leader did the Tariff Of Abominations lead to publicly support the doctrine of nullification?

John C. Calhoun


What southern leader did the Tariff of Abominations lead to public support the doctrine of nullification?

john c. calhoun


Which vice president resigned from office to lead the fight against the 1832 tariff?

John C. Calhoun


How might the sectional issues involved in the dispute over the Tariff of Abominations lead to further problems?

The North and South wouldn't be able to trade and it would greatly hurt their economy.


Why wouldn't people in the south pay a tax?

Preceding the civil war, a tariff on goods from the south was placed, named by the South as the Tariff of Abominations. The South, particularly South Carolina, then declared that these taxes were unconstitutional, and as such did not apply to them. This was one of a number of incidents that would lead to C


How might the sectional issues involved in the over the tariff of abominations lead to future problem between north and south?

The North and South wouldn't be able to trade and it would greatly hurt their economy.


How might the sectional issues involved in the dispute over the Tariff of Abominations lead to the future problems between Northerns and Southerns?

The North and South wouldn't be able to trade and it would greatly hurt their economy.


What was the tariff of abominations?

The Tricky "Tariff of Abominations" In 1824, Congress increased the general tariff significantly. The Tariff of 1828- called the "Black Tariff" or the "Tariff of Abominations"; also called the "Yankee Tariff". It was hated by Southerners because it was an extremely high tariff and they felt it discriminated against them. The South was having economic struggles and the tariff was a scapegoat. The South Carolina Exposition, made by John C. Calhoun, was published in 1828. It was a pamphlet that denounced the Tariff of 1828 as unjust and unconstitutional. "Nullies" in the South In an attempt to meet the South's demands, Congress passed the Tariff of 1832, a slightly lower tariff compared to the Tariff of 1828. It fell short of the South's demands. The state legislature of South Carolina called for the Columbia Convention. The delegates of the convention called for the tariff to be void within South Carolina. The convention threatened to take South Carolina out of the Union if the government attempted to collect the customs duties by force. Henry Clay introduced the Tariff of 1833. It called for the gradual reduction of the Tariff of 1832 by about 10% over 8 years. By 1842, the rates would be back at the level of 1816. The compromise Tariff of 1833ended the dispute over the Tariff of 1832 between the South and the White House. The compromise was supported by South Carolina but not much by the other states of the South. http://www.apnotes.net/ch13.html


How might the sectional issues involved in the dispute over the tariff of abominations lead to to future problems between north and south?

The North and South wouldn't be able to trade and it would greatly hurt their economy.


How might the sectional issues involved in the disput over the tariff of abominations lead to future problems between north and south?

The North and South wouldn't be able to trade and it would greatly hurt their economy.


How might the sectional issues involved in dispute over the tariff of abominations lead to future problems between north and south?

The North and South wouldn't be able to trade and it would greatly hurt their economy.