.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agothey were against the Act
It violated the Missouri Compromise.
Because it could have allowed some new slave-states in the West.
they werent happy with it... many just went along with it, but a brave few decided to help the underground railroad
Many Northerners were for the proclamation that ended slavery. However, there were Northerners who felt like Southerners and opposed it.
.
Northerners, especially abolitionists, disliked the 'Bloodhound Law' as it required escaped slaves to be returned to their masters even if they were found in a free state. Northerners worried that the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was part of a vast conspiracy of the southern plantation elite.
They strongly disapproved of the act.
It angered Northerners, because they were forced to return slaves that had escaped back to their owners in the South.
Carpetbagger
they were against the Act
Fugitive Slave Act
The Fugitive Slave Law.
It violated the Missouri Compromise.
Northerners were most pleased that California was admitted as a free state. The south was pleased that the fugitive slave act REQUIRED assistance in capturing runaway slaves or face imprisonment.
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 intensified opposition to slavery in the North by requiring northerners to assist in the capture and return of escaped slaves. This led to heightened tensions between pro- and anti-slavery factions, as many people in the North resented being forced to participate in the enforcement of slavery. The act also sparked a wave of resistance and defiance, with some northerners aiding fugitive slaves in their escape.
This act was made for the south to be able to go to the north and search for their run-away slaves and to be able to go into a northerners house and search for them. Sometimes the slaves would hide in the barn with out the northerners knowing and the northerners would get in trouble for it and they did not care if they were telling the truth about not hiding slaves or not they would still get in trouble.