0
they taxed the tea so they got mad for taxing the tea.
_________________________________________________________
Actually, The tea act LOWERED the price of the tea.
2 reasons that the colonists were angry was because it violated their English right, of only being taxed by their elected representatives, NOT Parliment.
Another reason, is because the East India Company was given a special 'treatment' that allowed it to ship tea cheaper than other places, thereby giving it the oppritunity to sell it cheaper, making it where the foreign merchants in the colonies go out of buisness for selling so high.
What else can I help you with?
Why did the colonist felt the stamp act violated their rights?
the colonist were mad
How did the Declaratory Act violate the rights of the colonial assemblies?
It violated their right to freedom
Which action by Britain did the colonists believe violated the principle stated in the Declaration of Independence that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed?
passage of the stamp act.
Who did the stamp act of 1765 affect?
The Stamp Act of 1765 primarily affected American colonists, particularly those engaged in commerce and legal affairs, as it imposed a direct tax on printed materials such as newspapers, legal documents, and playing cards. This legislation sparked widespread protest and resistance among colonists, who argued that it violated their rights as Englishmen since they were not represented in the British Parliament. The act ultimately contributed to growing tensions between Britain and the colonies, leading to the American Revolution.
What right did colonists say acts violate?
The colonists claimed that the stamp, sugar, tea, and townshend acts violated the right to only be taxed with representation. The colonists had no representatives in the Mother country; this is where the popular phrase "no taxation without representation" came from.
How did the stamp act angered the colonist how the reacted to it?
The colonists were required to pay for a stamp when they bought paper products, and the colonists felt that it violated their rights. So they published a series of resolutions stating that the stamp act violated their rights.
What rights did the sugar act violate?
the rights that were being violated by the sugar act was that the British made the colonists trade the tea with the india company which
How did the colonists feel about the. Quartering act?
Colonists disputed the legality of this act because it seemed to violate the Bill of Rights.
Why did colonists refer to the coercive act as The Intolerable Acts?
It basically violated their rights and they didnt like to be constantly taxed.
Why did the colonists refer to the coercive act as the intolerable acts?
It basically violated their rights and they didnt like to be constantly taxed.
What angered American colonist about the Stamp Act of 1765?
The American colonists claimed that their constitutional rights were being violated.
How did the the colonists react in the iron act?
The colonists felt that their rights as Englishmen were being violated. The writs of assistance violated their right to be secure in their own homes and vice-admiralty courts violated their right to a jury trail.
How did the quartering act violate colonist's rights?
The Quartering Act violated the colonists rights in at least twenty areas. The colonist were forced to house British officials and took away right to trial by jury.
Why did the colonists dislike the Stamp Act of 1765?
The colonist felt that the taxes violated there rights and also the British couldn't pull taxation without representation.
Which act of the parliament caused the colonists to argue that the British had violated the principle of taxation with representation?
the stamp act
Which act of Parliament caused the colonists to argue that the British had violated the principle of taxation without representation?
the stamp act
What rights did America feel great Britain violated?
The new acts Britain imposed on the colonists were not liked. They were protested and hated. The colonists didn't want to be taxed without representation. Britain thought they were being ridiculous. On the other hand colonists thought they were right and they thought Britain was violating there rights. These are the acts that violated the colonists rights. The stamp act of 1765 placed new duties on legal documents such as wills, diplomas, and marriage papers. It also taxed newspapers, almanacs, playing cards, and even dice. The colonist did not like the law because they did not want to pay more taxes. Britain on the other hand thought they should help pay for the costs of the French and Indian war. So colonists said that in the Magna Carta there is a principle that says " No taxation without representation". So since they had no representatives in parliament they could not pass any new taxes on them without them having a say in it. The writs of assistance allowed officers to inspect a person's property without giving a reason. Colonists protested that the writs of assistance violated their rights as British citizens. Under British law, a government official could not search a person's property without having a good reason for suspecting that the person had committed a crime. Colonists angry lily cited the words of James Otis of Massachusetts. The quartering acts was passed so colonists would give soldiers stationed in the colonies housing, candles, bedding, and beverages. Colonists protested against this new law especially. They didn't like this new act because they did not want to keep soldiers or strangers in their houses because they were afraid of them. Colonists refused to obey the law but especially in New York. This act violated the colonists right because in the English bill of rights it says that the people are not responsible for aiding or housing an army. These are the acts that violated the colonists rights. The stamp act violated the colonists rights because in the Magna Carta there is a principle that says " No taxation without representation". The writs of assistance violated colonists rights because under British law, a government official could not search a person's property without having a good reason for suspecting that the person had committed a crime. The quartering acts violated colonists right because in the English bill of rights it says that the people are not responsible for aiding or housing an army. These are the reasons why those acts violated colonists rights.
