Because racism was a strong belief for the whites. They didn't like the idea of people opposing the idea of racism. And also the was one head of police in birmingham.... but i forgot his name. I do know he hated blacks though (RACIST!). Also kid's wanted to fill up the jail so the police couldn't fit anymore people in jail, and when the police would say that they could get out they would protest and say no, for they wanted their offspring to be free!
The Children's march was to help stop segregation in Birmingham Alabama. Also It began because African American children wanted equal rights. They wanted the same treatment as they treated the Caucasian. They really don't care if they go to jail, they want there freedom. and It talks about children marching in Birmingham, Alabama to fight for there freedom.
There is no relationship between SOS childrens village and Government. Its a non profit....run by donor's money ....It a very good organization.
because he was careless about money and his children knew that it was wrong and he died destitute on March 6, 1941.
He did not have any childrens , his sister did, i am one of the descendant of this great man, he is my great great great great grand uncle. My great grandfather was his great grand nephew.
She was arrested on December 1st, 1955 for refusing to stand up on the orders of a bus driver. she refused to get up 6:06 pm but she was not arrested then.
The childrens march was dangerous because the children didnt know where they were going.
The childrens march was in Birmingham Alabama
The police arrested them
John Kennedy was the President in May, 1963 when the children in Birmingham made their march.
The Children's march was to help stop segregation in Birmingham Alabama. Also It began because African American children wanted equal rights. They wanted the same treatment as they treated the Caucasian. They really don't care if they go to jail, they want there freedom. and It talks about children marching in Birmingham, Alabama to fight for there freedom.
2nd-3rd March 1963
No, "childrens" should be "children's" to show possession.
she does have childrens
March 20
She had no children
unfortunately for children, no
Robert has childrens and he has six of them.