The peasants were unhappy because they lacked food to eat, and to survive. Also King Louis IVV forced them to pay taxes. The King did nothing to stop the local aristocrat's animals wandering all over their land eating the crops. They worked at farms for nothing, the amount of money they get paid was little or nothing while the aristocrats had plenty.
It sort of can be compared to the way things are going now with gas prices, sooner or later the "peasants" will get tired of being gouged by the oil companies and bring them down.
And... not to mention... the peasants were at the bottom of the social class. they didnt have many rights, so they couldn't get different or better jobs.
The Colonists won their independence from Great Britain.
The Communist Party, particularly through its Bolshevik faction led by Vladimir Lenin, played a pivotal role in the Russian Revolution of 1917. They capitalized on widespread discontent with the Provisional Government and sought to establish a socialist state based on Marxist principles. The Bolsheviks rallied support from workers and soldiers, ultimately leading the October Revolution, which resulted in the overthrow of the Provisional Government and the establishment of a communist regime. Their leadership and vision for a classless society were crucial in shaping the course of Russian history thereafter.
Technology developed during the Industrial Revolution allowed for the mass production of goods such as textiles" is the best option. The Industrial Revolution changed the course of economic history.
It was King Chulalongkornuntil his death in 1910, and then his sons ruled, solitarily of course, until the Siamese Revolution in 1932.
About one third or 1/3
same thing im looking for
The influential local councils of workers, peasants, and soldiers formed by the Social Revolutionaries in cities like Petrograd were called "soviets." These soviets played a key role during the Russian Revolution in 1917, representing the interests of the working class and influencing the course of events in the early stages of the revolution. They provided a forum for political debate, decision-making, and organization among the various groups in society.
Of course they did.
Of course you do.
Of course ...
the Mexicans of course. then the texans rebelled hence the texas revolution.
The college Graduate Tutor should be consulted about how to approach unresolved problems on the course. If, after consulting the Course supervisor, the matter is not resolved to the student's satisfaction, or if the student is dissatisfied with the support available from these persons.
Most medieval peasants were poor. In fact, most were serfs, who could not own land and were not allowed to move away from the manors on which they lived. A few peasants were independent farmers who held their own land, and some of these were referred to by contemporary writers as wealthy. They were, of course only wealthy relative to other peasants, and had very little wealth compared to the lords.
The source of the discontent was to be found in the Catholic church instead of in the cane fields. It was directed from the pulpit which gave it a moral underpinning that the Spanish government had a hard time dealing with.
of course the workers who made this or the government :P its me youbin but not the author of answers....
Slavery wasn't even much of a problem then. Peasants were his slaves you can say... and of course he had no problem with that.
the scientific revolution was believed to change history of course and people socially and intellectually