It's difficult to say definitively whether society would have been better off with Harrison in charge, as it depends on the context and specific circumstances of his leadership. If we consider the themes of freedom and individuality from Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron," one could argue that a society led by Harrison might have prioritized personal expression and equality of opportunity over enforced mediocrity. However, his radical approach could have also led to chaos and conflict, undermining social stability. Ultimately, the impact of his leadership would hinge on how well it balanced individuality with societal cohesion.
William Henry Harrison was born on February 9, 1773, meaning that, as of February 2010, he would be 237 years old.
Well, that is an interesting question. I would say Tenskwatawa. The leader of US forces was William Henry Harrison, but the leader of the native American forces, Tecumseh, wasn't actually involved in the battle at all. His brother Tenskwatawa, a spiritual leader, was in charge while Tecumseh was out recruiting. He led a force to attack Harrison's forces, and was ultimately driven away, but Tecumseh rebuilt and continued to oppose the US, ultimately joining the British in the War of 1812.
The Speaker of the United House of Representatives would take charge if the President and Vice President would die. As of 2014, it would be John Boehner.
someone help me :p
Charge for ironing a shirt, would depend on the type of material, special products used and time taken. The charge could be from $3 to $10.
Sociology
Society would be better; what is considered his "comedy" is just a series of unintelligent jokes and noises.
If everyone were the same in "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, it would mean that all individuals would be equal in every aspect, regardless of their abilities or attributes. This would result in a society where no one excels or stands out, as everyone is forced to conform to the same average level. The story explores the dangers of extreme equality and the suppression of individuality, creativity, and talent in the pursuit of a homogeneous society.
Do something immediately, dont debate the issues
yes
A better society would be a place of no crime, violence, hate, jealousy, ect. Where we would live amongsts each other teaching each other, learning from one another and trying to bring ourselves, as 1 race, into a higher self. A better society doesn't care what their neighbor is doing, but would be building with their neighbor and keeping peace within a Strong Minded Society. -Rawknykz
That depends on whether they are fighting with weapons or for women. :)I think that Harrison Ford would probably pull out a gun and shoot Brad while Brad was getting ready to wail on him with his fists... so Harrison would win.I personally also think that Harrison Ford is better looking, but it's a close call, and since Brad is younger, he might win in a war of attraction.
yes there is if there wasn't the society would be better.
No. Neutrons are neutral, meaning they don't have a charge.
Harrison was extraordinary his entire life, but, in my opinion, when he was fourteen the "Handicapper General" realized that none of the handicaps available would work on him. That is why Harrison was imprisoned when he was fourteen. As far as why Vonnegut chose the age of fourteen, probably due to that is when most people start to discover who they are and what they want to become. It could also be relevent to the author's life.
Yes you can, the PSP battery will continue to charge even when you are playing. I would not recommend to do that, it is better if you leave it to charge and then play.
Karl Marx, a German philosopher and economist, envisioned a classless society where common people, known as the proletariat, would control their own fate. Marx believed that this society would be achieved through revolution and the establishment of a socialist system where wealth and resources are shared equally among all members of society.