If all the frogs died, the raccoon population would most likely increase initially due to a reduction in competition for resources and the potential availability of new food sources. Frogs serve as both prey and a part of the ecosystem, so their absence could disrupt food webs, leading to overpopulation of some species and the decline of others. However, over time, the loss of frogs could result in ecological imbalances that might ultimately affect raccoon populations negatively, as they rely on diverse prey and healthy ecosystems.
If all frogs died, the raccoon population would likely decrease due to a loss of a food source. Frogs are an important part of the raccoon's diet, and the lack of this prey could lead to starvation or population decline for raccoons.
If most of the top predators in an area died, the herbivore population would likely increase due to reduced predation pressure. This increase in herbivore population size could lead to overgrazing and a decline in vegetation. In turn, this could negatively impact the population size of low-level carnivores that rely on herbivores for food.
The grasshopper population.
The grasshopper population.
Suppose we are interested in the population of people in, say, Saudi Arabia. A person would be said to have left this population if they died or emigrated. If we were interested in, say, the population of trout in Lake Superior then a fish would be said to have left this population if it died, swam into another body of water or was removed by angling or fishing.
they die
Most Likely Their Spirit Would Naturally Stay At The Place Where They Died But It Is A Mystery To Whether They Can Leave.
Very likely it spread over most of england. millions died. it was very unlikely you would survive.
it would be 3115920
they will die
Yes, if he didn't kill himself he would most likely have been executed after WW2 and if he managed to avoid that he would by now have most likely died from old age.
If he died in his sleep, he most likely do not experience pain.