increase
a black individual would marry into the white race category
A thematic map would be most likely used to depict grizzly bear population, displaying the distribution and density of grizzly bears in different regions. This type of map would visually represent the data through colors, symbols, or shading to show the concentration and dispersion of grizzly bear populations.
True. If a disease significantly reduced the rabbit population, it would also impact the coyote population in the same environment, as coyotes rely on rabbits as a food source. With fewer rabbits available, the coyote population would likely suffer from decreased food supply, potentially leading to a decline in their population as well.
As of 2021, Valhalla Partners, being a venture capital firm, likely has a small population consisting of its team members and employees. The exact number would be proprietary information and subject to change.
A person living outside a Sumerian city would likely be a farmer or involved in agricultural activities. They might have lived in rural villages or settlements surrounding the city to support its urban population with food and resources.
It would have minimal effect as frogs are only a small part of a raccoon's diet.
It is unlikely that all frogs dying would have a significant impact on the raccoon population. Raccoons have a varied diet and can adapt to changes in their environment by consuming other prey items. While frogs may be a part of a raccoon's diet, their absence is unlikely to cause a substantial decrease in the raccoon population.
Decrease, as snakes are predators of frogs and an increase in snake population would lead to more predation on frogs, reducing their population.
If all the frogs died, the raccoon population would most likely increase initially due to a reduction in competition for resources and the potential availability of new food sources. Frogs serve as both prey and a part of the ecosystem, so their absence could disrupt food webs, leading to overpopulation of some species and the decline of others. However, over time, the loss of frogs could result in ecological imbalances that might ultimately affect raccoon populations negatively, as they rely on diverse prey and healthy ecosystems.
If the number of frogs increases, the snake population would most likely also increase due to the greater availability of food. Snakes that prey on frogs would find more resources, enabling them to thrive and reproduce. However, this dynamic could also depend on other factors, such as habitat conditions and competition for resources. Overall, an increase in the frog population typically supports a corresponding rise in the snake population.
i think that there population would degress because they would need tons of frogs to keep on there population. kk bye?
it depends which one is healthier and which one is stronger
There will be more beetles available for other organisms.The real answer is Coatis will eat more frogs
if it had feathers plucked it was most likely a raccoon
you would starve and die it's as simple as that!
there would be no snakes to eat the frogs and with more frogs their would be less grasshoppers
Sounds like a cat. Could be a raccoon, but a raccoon is likely to finish the meal. A fog might, but is likely to tear up the rest of the carcass. A ferret or mink would have carried it back to its nest. So, a cat is the most likely suspect.