The Greek ships, particularly the triremes, were faster, more maneuverable, and better designed for ramming enemy vessels than the larger Persian ships. The Greeks leveraged their superior tactics and knowledge of local waters, especially during the Battle of Salamis, where they used narrow straits to negate the numerical advantage of the Persian fleet. Additionally, the Greeks had well-trained crews and a strong sense of unity and purpose, which played a critical role in their naval victories.
The Persian fleet comprised mainly of Phoenician, Asian-Greek and Egyptian ships.
During the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE, the Greeks are estimated to have sunk around 300 Persian ships. This decisive naval battle was a turning point in the Greco-Persian Wars, showcasing the effectiveness of the Greek trireme and the strategic acumen of leaders like Themistocles. The exact number of ships lost can vary in historical accounts, but the Greeks' victory significantly weakened the Persian naval fleet.
The Greek navy was able to defeat the Persian navy through superior tactics, better naval strategy, and the advantages of local knowledge. During the Battle of Salamis, the Greeks, led by Themistocles, used the narrow straits to their advantage, allowing their smaller, more maneuverable triremes to outmaneuver the larger Persian ships. Additionally, the Greeks demonstrated exceptional coordination and unity, which contrasted with the often disorganized Persian forces. This combination of strategic advantage and effective execution led to a decisive Greek victory.
It was not a Greek who conquered Asia Minor and the Persian Empire, it was the Macedonian king Alexander the Great
A coalition of Greek city-states fought the invading Persian army and its Greek allies outside the Greek city of Plataea in 479 BCE. The defending Greek army of armoured foot soldiers kept to the rough ground to negate the Persian cavalry, then engaged and defeated the unarmoured Persian infantry. At the same time a Greek fleet swooped on the remnants of the Persian fleet at Mycale and captured it. This combined action ended the invasion of mainland Greece by the Persian king Xerxes.
A coalition of southern Greek city-states defeated a Persian fleet of Phoenician, Greek and Egyptian ships at the naval battle of Salamis.
A Persian fleet of about 400 ships and a similar nuber of ships from a consortium of Greek city-states.
In the Battle of Salamis, Greek ships, primarily triremes, were smaller, faster, and more maneuverable than the larger Persian vessels. Greek triremes featured three rows of oars and were designed for ramming tactics, allowing them to exploit their agility in close combat. In contrast, Persian ships were typically larger and more heavily built, which made them less nimble and more vulnerable to the Greek's tactical advantages. This disparity in design and maneuverability played a crucial role in the Greek victory.
The Greek ships, particularly the triremes, had several advantages over the Persian ships during the Battle of Salamis. They were smaller, faster, and more maneuverable, allowing them to navigate the narrow straits effectively. Additionally, the Greek commanders used their knowledge of the local geography to outmaneuver the larger Persian vessels, which were less agile in tight spaces. This tactical superiority enabled the Greeks to exploit their ships' speed and agility to launch surprise attacks and retreat quickly.
Greek sea power and the fact that Persian sea power depended on Phoenician, Greek and Egyptian ships, made it inevitable that Persia could not prevail.
The Persian ships were larger and relied on closing to enemy ships to board. The Greek ships were lighter and more manoeuverable, and relied on ramming and sinking the opposition.
At the Battle of Salamis, the Greek ships were built specifically for fighting at sea, whereas the Persian ships were not, and also the Greeks were much better sailors. The mast and sails were taken down and stowed for fighting, and the ships were maneuvered entirely by the oarsmen. The Persian ships were sunk by ramming them.
The Persian fleet comprised mainly of Phoenician, Asian-Greek and Egyptian ships.
The combined southern Greek city fleets defeated the Persian fleet compised mainly of Phoenician, Asian-Greek and Egyptian ships. This left the Persian army without naval support and supply.
They conned the Persians into splitting their fleet, then enticed them into the narrow waters between Salamis and Athens, where they again had to split their fleet and advance through the narrow chanels with exposed flanks. In this, the smaller more manoeuverable Greek ships were able to outmanoeuvre the heavier Persian ships.
The Persian fleet was not concentrated or with free manoeuvre room. It sent a major force at the passage north west of the island to prevent a Greek escape, which was not engaged in the battle and depleted the Persian naval force. In order to engage the Greek fleet, the remaining Persian ships were split in two going around each side of the island of Psyttalia, and to get through the passages they were in column rather on a broad fighting front. This enabled the Greek ships to attack them from the flanks with ramming tactics. The Persians, with larger ships, relied on closing with the enemy, using missiles and boarding. The Greeks with smaller, more agile ships, relied on ramming. The Sal;amis scenario which developed favoured the Greek tactics.
During the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE, the Greeks are estimated to have sunk around 300 Persian ships. This decisive naval battle was a turning point in the Greco-Persian Wars, showcasing the effectiveness of the Greek trireme and the strategic acumen of leaders like Themistocles. The exact number of ships lost can vary in historical accounts, but the Greeks' victory significantly weakened the Persian naval fleet.