During the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE, the Greeks are estimated to have sunk around 300 Persian ships. This decisive naval battle was a turning point in the Greco-Persian Wars, showcasing the effectiveness of the Greek trireme and the strategic acumen of leaders like Themistocles. The exact number of ships lost can vary in historical accounts, but the Greeks' victory significantly weakened the Persian naval fleet.
This is not known, but with 40 ships lost, perhaps 8,000.
The Greeks won the Battle of Salamis through genius strategy and used similar tactics to the ones used at Thermopylae. The Greeks sailed their fleet into a narrow channel between two parts of the island of salamis, completely taking away the advantage of the large, phoenician built, Persian ships and taking away the advantage of their numbers, just like at Thermopylae. The Greeks then used their smaller, more maneuverable ships to ram and sink the Persian vessels, dealing a crushing defeat to Xerxes army. This defeat caused Xerxes to lose his will to fight, and he returned to Persia with the bulk of his army only leaving behind 70,000 in a hopeless last effort to defeat the Greeks. This Persian army of 70,000 would later be crushed at the Battle of Plataea, the final battle of the Persian wars.
If the Trojans had any ships at all, and even if they were better than the Greek ships, the Greeks still had many more ships. Perhaps the "thousand ships" was poetic license, but the Trojans could not possibly have matched the Greeks at sea.
About 400 ships on each side, with two hundred per ship. 400x200=80,000.
Herodotus and many Greeks perceived the Persians as weak due to their view of Persian governance and social structure, which emphasized despotism and a lack of civic engagement among the populace. Greeks valued their own democratic ideals and the active participation of citizens in governance, contrasting it with the Persian monarchy, where power was centralized in a single ruler. Additionally, the Greeks often highlighted the Persians' reliance on vast, diverse territories and satraps, which they believed made the empire less cohesive and more vulnerable to internal strife. This cultural bias reinforced the Greek belief in their own superiority and the perceived fragility of Persian power.
This is not known, but with 40 ships lost, perhaps 8,000.
The Greeks won the Battle of Salamis through genius strategy and used similar tactics to the ones used at Thermopylae. The Greeks sailed their fleet into a narrow channel between two parts of the island of salamis, completely taking away the advantage of the large, phoenician built, Persian ships and taking away the advantage of their numbers, just like at Thermopylae. The Greeks then used their smaller, more maneuverable ships to ram and sink the Persian vessels, dealing a crushing defeat to Xerxes army. This defeat caused Xerxes to lose his will to fight, and he returned to Persia with the bulk of his army only leaving behind 70,000 in a hopeless last effort to defeat the Greeks. This Persian army of 70,000 would later be crushed at the Battle of Plataea, the final battle of the Persian wars.
There were several - the most notable were Salamis (in the Saronic Gulf between the island of Salamis and Athens in 480; Mykale in Asia Minor 479 BCE and Eurymedon in Asia Minor 466 BCE.
The actual number of people who died in the Battle of Salamis is not recorded. However, more than 300 ships were lost, many of them with all hands.
Three major ones - the sea battle of Salamis 480 BCE, the land battle of Plataia 479 BCE, and the sea-land battle of Mykale 479 BCE.
Salamis was a sea battle. With about 400 ships on each side, each had 400 x 200 crew = 80,000.
Can you clarify where and when you are talking about, and what are Persian Greeks?
800 ships, crew of each 200 = 160,000.
If the Trojans had any ships at all, and even if they were better than the Greek ships, the Greeks still had many more ships. Perhaps the "thousand ships" was poetic license, but the Trojans could not possibly have matched the Greeks at sea.
Technology advantages are not conclusive - a successful foe adapts strategies and tactics to even up the odds. The Greek infantry had metal armour which gave them an unassailable advantage over the Persian infantry. The Persians therefore relied on their superior cavalry, which led the Greeks to keep to broken ground at the battle of Plataia. And Athens won at Marathon by seizing the opportunity of swooping down and defeating the Persian infantry while the Persian cavalry was being loaded onto ships. The Persian warships were heavier and superior to the Greek ships, which led the Greeks to seek naval engagements in narrow waters were they could outmanoeuvre the Persia in their smaller faster ships an use rams to attack the Persians who relied on boarding. These tactics succeeded in the decisive battle of Salamis. The Persians tried to avoid a straight out contest anyway, relying on the venality of the Greeks by bribing them - at the naval battle of Lade the bribed-half of the Ionian-Greek fleet left the battle and their allies to certain defeat; later Xerxes' invasion was preceded by emissaries with bags of gold, resulting in many of the northern Greek cites siding and fighting with him at Plataia.
At the critical battles of Salamis, Plataea and Mycale the numbers engaged on both sides were about even.
The Athenians had 180 ships of their own along with another 191 from other city-states of mainland Greece who fought alongside.