They led armies out into battle.
I Dont know it need help
Ten generals - one from each tribe - were appointed to lead the army. They were often given directions by the Assembly to to implement decisions by the Assembly, as they were appointed on merit, rather than randomly by lot as were the 500 council members.
The ten generals were appointed by the ten tribes, one by each tribe. Other office bearers were appointed by the lottery machine at random. As much as many Athenians wanted office bearers to come from the people at large, there was no way that they were going to allow themselves to be led in battle by some donkey selected at random, hence appointment by the tribes. In furtherance of this line of thought, when the assembly of the people made a decision, if it was important, they would add the rider 'the generals to implement', even if it was non-military, so that they had someone reliable to fix it up and make it work.
Of the ten generals, it was the turn of Miltiades on the day of the battle.
There were ten Athenian generals - one for each tribal regiment, plus a polemarch - the magistrate charged with commanding the army - his name was Callimachus.The stroy goes that each of the generals had command in succession for a day each. The battle occurred on the tenth day, on which day it was the turn of Miltiades.
Athens had 10 generals (strategoi) - one for each of the ten tribes which contributed to the Athenian army. The senior one was the Polemarch who was the magistrate nominally in command. The generals were alloted tasks and given resources to carry them out. The story at Marathon was that they took it in turns to command on each day, and it was Miltiades' turn on day 10 when the Persians split their cavalry off and gave the opportunity to defeat their infantry.
0Carried out laws
yes
Each of the ten Athenian tribes elected a general. It was an annual appointment, so there ware thousands of them over time.
The top ten generals in the Athenian assembly were stop trying to cheat, study, pay attenuation in class, and don't do your HW online look in a textbook.
Ten generals - one from each tribe - were appointed to lead the army. They were often given directions by the Assembly to to implement decisions by the Assembly, as they were appointed on merit, rather than randomly by lot as were the 500 council members.
The ten generals were appointed by the ten tribes, one by each tribe. Other office bearers were appointed by the lottery machine at random. As much as many Athenians wanted office bearers to come from the people at large, there was no way that they were going to allow themselves to be led in battle by some donkey selected at random, hence appointment by the tribes. In furtherance of this line of thought, when the assembly of the people made a decision, if it was important, they would add the rider 'the generals to implement', even if it was non-military, so that they had someone reliable to fix it up and make it work.
The number of generals appointed by the assembly in ancient Greece varied depending on the city-state and the time period. In Athens, for example, there were typically ten generals elected each year. Other city-states may have had different numbers of generals, depending on their military needs and political structure.
The ten generals, one nominated by each tribe, commanded the army and the war fleet. Under the democracy, as the magistrates and other officials were chosen by lot and not necessarily competent, any difficult task approved by the Assembly of the people usually had a rider 'and the generals will see to it'. They had confidence in the generals because no one selected dumb generals to lead them into battles.
Of the ten generals, it was the turn of Miltiades on the day of the battle.
There were ten Athenian generals - one for each tribal regiment, plus a polemarch - the magistrate charged with commanding the army - his name was Callimachus.The stroy goes that each of the generals had command in succession for a day each. The battle occurred on the tenth day, on which day it was the turn of Miltiades.
Athens had 10 generals (strategoi) - one for each of the ten tribes which contributed to the Athenian army. The senior one was the Polemarch who was the magistrate nominally in command. The generals were alloted tasks and given resources to carry them out. The story at Marathon was that they took it in turns to command on each day, and it was Miltiades' turn on day 10 when the Persians split their cavalry off and gave the opportunity to defeat their infantry.
The commanded sections of the army and navy. And as the executive government was in the hands of inexperienced citizens selected by lot, any important decision by the assembly of the citizens usually had a rider 'the generals to implement'. Unlike the other office bearers, the general were nominated one from each tribe - the Athenians didn't to be led in battle by someone whose name was drawn out of a hat.