The top ten generals in the Athenian assembly were stop trying to cheat, study, pay attenuation in class, and don't do your HW online look in a textbook.
Each of the ten Athenian tribes elected a general. It was an annual appointment, so there ware thousands of them over time.
The ten generals, one nominated by each tribe, commanded the army and the war fleet. Under the democracy, as the magistrates and other officials were chosen by lot and not necessarily competent, any difficult task approved by the Assembly of the people usually had a rider 'and the generals will see to it'. They had confidence in the generals because no one selected dumb generals to lead them into battles.
the Athenian assembly had to have 6000 people to meet and once they had that 6000 people they decided laws and other issues you may want to look up Athenian democracy on wikapediaThe citizens met fortnightly and determined on issues raised by the Council or themselves. The decisions of the Assembly were to be implemented by the Council between meetings, but the job was often allocated by the Assembly to the 10 generals whom the citizens had more faith in than the Councillors who were appointed by drawing their names out of a barrel.
In Athens, ten generals were appointed, one from each tribe. Their job was to lead in war, however the Assembly often gave them important non-military matters to implement as they did not trust their randomly selected councilors to be reliably capable of doing major direction.
citizens
0Carried out laws
They led armies out into battle.
Each of the ten Athenian tribes elected a general. It was an annual appointment, so there ware thousands of them over time.
yes
The ten generals, one nominated by each tribe, commanded the army and the war fleet. Under the democracy, as the magistrates and other officials were chosen by lot and not necessarily competent, any difficult task approved by the Assembly of the people usually had a rider 'and the generals will see to it'. They had confidence in the generals because no one selected dumb generals to lead them into battles.
Of the ten generals, it was the turn of Miltiades on the day of the battle.
The ten generals were appointed by the ten tribes, one by each tribe. Other office bearers were appointed by the lottery machine at random. As much as many Athenians wanted office bearers to come from the people at large, there was no way that they were going to allow themselves to be led in battle by some donkey selected at random, hence appointment by the tribes. In furtherance of this line of thought, when the assembly of the people made a decision, if it was important, they would add the rider 'the generals to implement', even if it was non-military, so that they had someone reliable to fix it up and make it work.
Ten generals - one from each tribe - were appointed to lead the army. They were often given directions by the Assembly to to implement decisions by the Assembly, as they were appointed on merit, rather than randomly by lot as were the 500 council members.
the Athenian assembly had to have 6000 people to meet and once they had that 6000 people they decided laws and other issues you may want to look up Athenian democracy on wikapediaThe citizens met fortnightly and determined on issues raised by the Council or themselves. The decisions of the Assembly were to be implemented by the Council between meetings, but the job was often allocated by the Assembly to the 10 generals whom the citizens had more faith in than the Councillors who were appointed by drawing their names out of a barrel.
There were ten Athenian generals - one for each tribal regiment, plus a polemarch - the magistrate charged with commanding the army - his name was Callimachus.The stroy goes that each of the generals had command in succession for a day each. The battle occurred on the tenth day, on which day it was the turn of Miltiades.
50
In Athens, ten generals were appointed, one from each tribe. Their job was to lead in war, however the Assembly often gave them important non-military matters to implement as they did not trust their randomly selected councilors to be reliably capable of doing major direction.