there was no record keeping in ancient Rome, the Romans were too stupid to write. Just kidding. In fact the Romans were meticulous record keepers. They had records of the rolls of citizenship for taxation purposes, they kept records of owners of property, records of trade such as ships' cargoes, weather records, the records of the politicians and their consulships and the military pay records, not to mention all the histories, both of the empire and of individuals.
quipu
Economic Transactions
It's called Quipus.
No, because if they were ancient, we would be too. Get it? Like ancient people lived in ancient times, and it isn't ancient times anymore
They study it and record it.
With feather ink and paper.
Scribes were the record keepers for Pharohs and Dignitaries.
They were a form of communication and record keeping. Also, not all ancient societies used hieroglyphics.
Communication and record keeping.
Sulfur has been known since ancient times. It was used by the ancient Egyptians and Greeks. Its discovery date is not precisely recorded as it was known and used before modern record-keeping.
it was used as a record of the ancient hebrews
Well i think that it was a scribe. Because they kept record keeping and they specialized in writing
That is the correct spelling of "record keeping" (saving data).
what are the advantage of computerized record keeping
Fo accounting, keeping track of the numbers of crops or animals, trading/bartering, etc.
Keeping records on clay tablets allowed ancient civilizations like the Sumerians to preserve important information for future reference or communication. Clay tablets were durable and could withstand the test of time, making them a reliable method of record-keeping in the absence of paper or digital resources. The inscriptions on clay tablets provided insight into ancient languages, cultures, and historical events.
That is the correct spelling of "record keeping" (saving data).