Ashoka's administration was marked by a focus on moral governance and the promotion of Buddhism, emphasizing principles like non-violence and welfare for all citizens. In contrast, Chandragupta Maurya's administration was characterized by a more centralized and militaristic approach, with a strong emphasis on state power and territorial expansion. While Chandragupta established a vast empire through conquest and strategic alliances, Ashoka aimed to consolidate that empire through ethical leadership and the spread of Dharma. Thus, the key difference lies in Ashoka's humanitarian focus compared to Chandragupta's pragmatic and militaristic governance.
They have the same religions
One similarity between the Maurya and Gupta empires was their promotion of trade and cultural exchange, which significantly contributed to the economic prosperity and cultural development of ancient India. A key difference, however, lies in their governance; the Maurya Empire, particularly under Ashoka, was known for its centralized and bureaucratic rule, whereas the Gupta Empire implemented a more decentralized system, allowing local leaders to maintain greater autonomy.
jain
They have the same religions
They have the same religions
FIGURE IT YOURSELF I AM TELLING YOU TEACHER U R CHEATING 🤪
what were the contributions mauryas had
Sungus
mauryas
he ruled it stricktly and harshly
cause they wanted to
the location,social structures, Religion, and goverment.
Not sure about that.
Maurya caste is related to ancient Shakya Khatriya clan. Chandragupta Maurya, Bindusar and Ashok were some Famous emperors of this caste. They were follower of Shakyamuni Budhha. But they were not rajputs. at that time rajput was in existence. rajputs came in existence in seventh century AD. Mauryas were not Rajputs.Mauryas and Shakyas were fiercest warriors and hence greatest in the age of Jainism and Buddhism.