The word "angry" is an adjective and so doesn't have a past tense. Only verbs have tenses.
No. Angry is an adjective and does not have a past tense.
Destroyed is the past tense of destroy...therefore there is not a past tense for destroyed.
The past tense is smote.
"Responsible" is an adjective. It does not have a past tense. Instead, the past tense would apply to the word before. (Present - she is responsible, Past - she was responsible.)
The word 'at' is not a verb and so doesn't have a past tense.
No. Angry is an adjective and does not have a past tense.
nothing, it stays the same, so you say i was angry or whatever
Angry is an adverb which does not have a past tense. Only verbs can have past tenses. As such, the verb for angry is anger, therefore the past tense is angered. eg: The sight of her angered him greatly.
No, "angry" is an adjective used to describe and emotion. It will not turn form from a present to a past tense, but will instead remian the same.
If your talking about Japanese language, the it is to get angry. Past tense verb. Dean
Was is a simple past tense of the verb "to be" used with singular nouns as in "The boy was angry," meaning at some point in the past the male in question was angry. Were is the correct past tense form to use when addressing more than one subject as in "The boys were angry." Along with the noun, it helps establish whether the referent is singular or plural.
the past tense of am is was and the past tense of has is had
The past tense of "has" is "had" and the past tense of "have" is "had."
Was and were are both the past tense of be. The present tense is: I am he is you are they are The past tense is: I was he was you were they were
"will be" is the future tense of "be". The past tense of "be" is "was/were".
The past tense is she did.
The word "were" is past tense. It is the past tense of the verb "to be."