More than likely as the main goal was to get gold to send back to Spain and the indians were the only available not quite human (to the Spanish) labor force very little would have changes with the conversion of the natives to Christianity. Much the same as the Christian slaves in the American south were still property not people.
After the Inca paid their Ransom, Francisco Pizarro killed Atahualpa because he didn't want to lose his gold
Francisco Pizarro
The Spanish explorer who took the Inca emperor Atahualpa hostage was Francisco Pizarro. In 1532, Pizarro captured Atahualpa during the Battle of Cajamarca, exploiting a surprise attack and the element of surprise. Pizarro later demanded a large ransom for Atahualpa's release, which was paid in gold and silver, but ultimately, Atahualpa was executed in 1533.
Atahualpa
When Francisco Pizarro captured Inca Emperor Atahualpa in 1532, he demanded a ransom of gold and silver in exchange for Atahualpa's release. The Incas complied, delivering a substantial amount of treasure, which filled a room with gold and silver. However, despite receiving the ransom, Pizarro executed Atahualpa in 1533, solidifying his control over the Inca Empire and its vast riches. This betrayal significantly contributed to the Spanish conquest of the Inca civilization.
There would have been no difference. The greed of the Spanish was such that they would do anything to get the gold.
He killed him because Atahualpa refused to allow his people to be converted to Christianity.
When Francisco Pizarro met with Incan leader Atahualpa, Pizarro captured Atahualpa and demanded a ransom for his release. Despite paying the ransom, Pizarro executed Atahualpa in 1533, which ultimately led to the downfall of the Inca Empire.
Atahualpa said to give Pizarro a royal chamber full of gold if Pizarro let Atahualpa go.
After the Inca paid their Ransom, Francisco Pizarro killed Atahualpa because he didn't want to lose his gold
Francisco Pizarro captures the Inca Emperor Atahualpa (November 16th)
pizarro
Pizarro had Atahualpa killed in 1533.
More than likely as the main goal was to get gold to send back to Spain and the indians were the only available not quite human (to the Spanish) labor force very little would have changes with the conversion of the natives to Christianity. Much the same as the Christian slaves in the American south were still property not people.
More than likely as the main goal was to get gold to send back to Spain and the indians were the only available not quite human (to the Spanish) labor force very little would have changes with the conversion of the natives to Christianity. Much the same as the Christian slaves in the American south were still property not people.
Pizarro killed Atahualpa in 1533. So yes he did.
Well, the Inca's did not survive they all died because of Pizarro. Atahualpa died from accepting Christianity so he didn't get burned alive, only to get strangled.