More than likely as the main goal was to get gold to send back to Spain and the indians were the only available not quite human (to the Spanish) labor force very little would have changes with the conversion of the natives to Christianity. Much the same as the Christian slaves in the American south were still property not people.
Ataxalpa was the Incan semi-divine ruler who's giant army was defeated by Francisco Pizarro and his men. He is also known as Atahualpa.
Francisco Pizarro was killed on 26 June 1541 in Lima (Peru) by a group of supporters of Diego Almagro II.
The expeditions of Hernán Cortés and Francisco Pizarro led to the Spanish conquest of the Aztec and Inca empires, respectively. Cortés's conquest in Mexico resulted in the fall of Tenochtitlán and the establishment of Spanish colonial rule, while Pizarro's expedition in Peru led to the capture and execution of Inca leader Atahualpa and the eventual Spanish domination of the region. These conquests significantly expanded Spanish territories in the Americas, facilitated the extraction of wealth through resources like gold and silver, and had profound impacts on indigenous populations, cultures, and societies.
yesyes
what job did francisco pizarro mom do
There would have been no difference. The greed of the Spanish was such that they would do anything to get the gold.
He killed him because Atahualpa refused to allow his people to be converted to Christianity.
When Francisco Pizarro met with Incan leader Atahualpa, Pizarro captured Atahualpa and demanded a ransom for his release. Despite paying the ransom, Pizarro executed Atahualpa in 1533, which ultimately led to the downfall of the Inca Empire.
Atahualpa said to give Pizarro a royal chamber full of gold if Pizarro let Atahualpa go.
Francisco Pizarro captures the Inca Emperor Atahualpa (November 16th)
After the Inca paid their Ransom, Francisco Pizarro killed Atahualpa because he didn't want to lose his gold
pizarro
Pizarro had Atahualpa killed in 1533.
More than likely as the main goal was to get gold to send back to Spain and the indians were the only available not quite human (to the Spanish) labor force very little would have changes with the conversion of the natives to Christianity. Much the same as the Christian slaves in the American south were still property not people.
More than likely as the main goal was to get gold to send back to Spain and the indians were the only available not quite human (to the Spanish) labor force very little would have changes with the conversion of the natives to Christianity. Much the same as the Christian slaves in the American south were still property not people.
Pizarro killed Atahualpa in 1533. So yes he did.
Well, the Inca's did not survive they all died because of Pizarro. Atahualpa died from accepting Christianity so he didn't get burned alive, only to get strangled.